379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25522165)
1. Effect of Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials on Reliability of Heat-Pressed Lithium Disilicate.
Stijacic T; Chung KH; Flinn BD; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 24(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 25522165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro study of the effect of different restorative materials on the reliability of a veneering porcelain.
Anderson MR; Chung KH; Flinn BD; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):521-8. PubMed ID: 24189113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.
Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations.
Belli R; Geinzer E; Muschweck A; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 24553249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fracture resistance in aqueous environment of four restorative systems for posterior applications. Part 1.
Dhima M; Assad DA; Volz JE; An KN; Berglund LJ; Carr AB; Salinas TJ
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 23279080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.
Vianna ALSV; Prado CJD; Bicalho AA; Pereira RADS; Neves FDD; Soares CJ
J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.
Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution.
Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study.
Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Augthun M; Spiekermann H
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 11484570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interfacial fracture toughness of different resin cements bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic.
Hooshmand T; Rostami G; Behroozibakhsh M; Fatemi M; Keshvad A; van Noort R
J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 22182467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of bond strength between leucite-based and lithium disilicate-based ceramics to dentin after cementation with conventional and self-adhesive resin agents.
Rigolin FJ; Miranda ME; Flório FM; Basting RT
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2014; 27(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 25335361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fracture resistance and fracture characterization of bilayered zirconia/fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate all ceramic crowns.
Altamimi AM; Tripodakis AP; Eliades G; Hirayama H
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 24757702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
Vult von Steyern P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis.
Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R
Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of ceramic thickness and ceramic materials on fracture resistance of posterior partial coverage restorations.
Bakeman EM; Rego N; Chaiyabutr Y; Kois JC
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 25330270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
