These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25522830)

  • 1. Time for a change: what dominance durations reveal about adaptation effects in the perception of a bi-stable reversible figure.
    Toppino TC; Long GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):867-82. PubMed ID: 25522830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Slant perception, and its voluntary control, do not govern the slant aftereffect: multiple slant signals adapt independently.
    Knapen T; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3381-92. PubMed ID: 16698056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual adaptation to structure-from-motion depends on the size of adaptor and probe objects, but not on the similarity of their shapes.
    Pastukhov A; Lissner A; Braun J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):473-88. PubMed ID: 24178065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization.
    Kanai R; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3109-16. PubMed ID: 16023173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disruption of implicit perceptual memory by intervening neutral stimuli.
    Kanai R; Knapen TH; van Ee R; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(20):2675-83. PubMed ID: 17697690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rivalry between afterimages and real images: the influence of the percept and the eye.
    Bartels A; Vázquez Y; Schindler A; Logothetis NK
    J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 21849628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance.
    Moreno-Bote R; Shpiro A; Rinzel J; Rubin N
    J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):1. PubMed ID: 20884496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binocular rivalry: spreading dominance through complex images.
    Arnold DH; James B; Roseboom W
    J Vis; 2009 Dec; 9(13):4.1-9. PubMed ID: 20055537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to keep a reversible figure from reversing: teasing out top-down and bottom-up processes.
    Long GM; Moran CJ
    Perception; 2007; 36(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 17455757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When can attention influence binocular rivalry?
    Dieter KC; Melnick MD; Tadin D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1908-18. PubMed ID: 25898898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revisiting the Lissajous figure as a tool to study bistable perception.
    Weilnhammer VA; Ludwig K; Sterzer P; Hesselmann G
    Vision Res; 2014 May; 98():107-12. PubMed ID: 24718018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dynamics of perceptual rivalry in bistable and tristable perception.
    Wallis G; Ringelhan S
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23426898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competition in bistable vision is attribute-specific.
    Grossmann JK; Dobbins AC
    Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 16045956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equivalence of physical and perceived speed in binocular rivalry.
    Baker DH; Graf EW
    J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):26.1-12. PubMed ID: 18484865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related deficits in attentional control of perceptual rivalry.
    Aydin S; Strang NC; Manahilov V
    Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 77():32-40. PubMed ID: 23206550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two forms of aftereffects induced by transparent motion reveal multilevel adaptation.
    Lee AL; Lu H
    J Vis; 2012 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 22505618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry.
    Watson TL; Pearson J; Clifford CW
    Curr Biol; 2004 Sep; 14(18):1670-4. PubMed ID: 15380070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry is prolonged by a dynamic surround.
    Takase S; Yukumatsu S; Bingushi K
    Vision Res; 2013 Nov; 92():33-8. PubMed ID: 24041849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cumulative history quantifies the role of neural adaptation in multistable perception.
    Pastukhov A; Braun J
    J Vis; 2011 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 21931128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.
    Meng M; Tong F
    J Vis; 2004 Jul; 4(7):539-51. PubMed ID: 15330700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.