149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25523374)
1. Cochrane Airways Group reviews were prioritized for updating using a pragmatic approach.
Welsh E; Stovold E; Karner C; Cates C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 25523374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Research gap of guidelines might be an important approach to prioritization (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:341-6).
Wang Q; Wang X; Chen Y; Yang K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():251-2. PubMed ID: 26073901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews.
Nasser M; Welch V; Tugwell P; Ueffing E; Doyle J; Waters E
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):474-82. PubMed ID: 22521577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The UpPriority tool supported prioritization processes for updating clinical guideline questions.
Sanabria AJ; Alonso-Coello P; McFarlane E; Niño de Guzman E; Roqué M; Martínez García L;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():149-159. PubMed ID: 34363971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of multi-attribute decision-making to inform prioritization of Cochrane review topics relevant to rehabilitation.
Taylor WJ; Green SE
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 Jun; 55(3):322-330. PubMed ID: 30947492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevention and self-management interventions are top priorities for osteoarthritis systematic reviews.
Jaramillo A; Welch VA; Ueffing E; Gruen RL; Bragge P; Lyddiatt A; Tugwell P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):503-510.e4. PubMed ID: 22995854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An equity lens can ensure an equity-oriented approach to agenda setting and priority setting of Cochrane Reviews.
Nasser M; Ueffing E; Welch V; Tugwell P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):511-21. PubMed ID: 23477991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
French SD; McDonald S; McKenzie JE; Green SE
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16225692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Global priority setting for Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health research.
Doyle J; Waters E; Yach D; McQueen D; De Francisco A; Stewart T; Reddy P; Gulmezoglu AM; Galea G; Portela A
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Mar; 59(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 15709077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Cochrane Collaboration review prioritization projects show that a variety of approaches successfully identify high-priority topics.
Bero LA; Binder L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):472-3. PubMed ID: 22959591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The UpPriority tool was developed to guide the prioritization of clinical guideline questions for updating.
Sanabria AJ; Pardo-Hernandez H; Ballesteros M; Canelo-Aybar C; McFarlane E; Niño de Guzman E; Penman K; Posso M; Roqué I Figuls M; Selva A; Vernooij RWM; Alonso-Coello P; Martínez García L;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():80-92. PubMed ID: 32565214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Cochrane Library review titles that are important to users of health care, a Cochrane Consumer Network project.
Wale JL; Belizán M; Nadel J; Jeffrey C; Vij SL
Health Expect; 2013 Dec; 16(4):e146-63. PubMed ID: 21895902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Priority oral health research identification for clinical decision-making.
Worthington H; Clarkson J; Weldon J
Evid Based Dent; 2015 Sep; 16(3):69-71. PubMed ID: 26492797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Descriptive analysis of cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews: an update and comparison between 2009 and 2013.
Crick K; Thomson D; Fernandes RM; Nuspl M; Eurich DT; Rowe BH; Hartling L
BMC Pediatr; 2017 Jul; 17(1):155. PubMed ID: 28693463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence in agenda setting: new directions for the Cochrane Collaboration.
Nasser M; Welch V; Ueffing E; Crowe S; Oliver S; Carlo R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):469-71. PubMed ID: 23312393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic decision-making process on the need for updating clinical practice guidelines proved to be feasible in a pilot study.
Becker M; Jaschinski T; Eikermann M; Mathes T; Bühn S; Koppert W; Leffler A; Neugebauer E; Pieper D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 96():101-109. PubMed ID: 29289763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Priority setting in guideline development: article 2 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
Atkins D; Perez-Padilla R; Macnee W; Buist AS; Cruz AA;
Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):225-8. PubMed ID: 23256163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care.
El Dib RP; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):689-92. PubMed ID: 17683315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A framework for effective collaboration between specialist and broad-spectrum groups for delivering priority Cochrane reviews.
Handoll HH; Stott DJ; Elstub LJ; Elliott JC; Kavanagh AL; Madhok R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):490-5. PubMed ID: 22537424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
