These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1896 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25523532)
21. ABSORB biodegradable stents versus second-generation metal stents: a comparison study of 100 complex lesions treated under OCT guidance. Mattesini A; Secco GG; Dall'Ara G; Ghione M; Rama-Merchan JC; Lupi A; Viceconte N; Lindsay AC; De Silva R; Foin N; Naganuma T; Valente S; Colombo A; Di Mario C JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):741-50. PubMed ID: 25060016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Randomized Comparison Between Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Stent: Multimodality Imaging Through 3 Years. Onuma Y; Honda Y; Asano T; Shiomi H; Kozuma K; Ozaki Y; Namiki A; Yasuda S; Ueno T; Ando K; Furuya J; Hanaoka KI; Tanabe K; Okada K; Kitahara H; Ono M; Kusano H; Rapoza R; Simonton C; Popma JJ; Stone GW; Fitzgerald PJ; Serruys PW; Kimura T JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 13(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 31918929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A prospective randomised study using optical coherence tomography to assess endothelial coverage and neointimal proliferation at 6-months after implantation of a coronary everolimus-eluting stent compared with a bare metal stent postdilated with a paclitaxel-eluting balloon (OCTOPUS Trial): rationale, design and methods. Poerner TC; Otto S; Gassdorf J; Janiak F; Danzer C; Ferrari M; Figulla HR EuroIntervention; 2011 May; 7 Suppl K():K93-9. PubMed ID: 22027737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of the conformability of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds to metal platform coronary stents. Gomez-Lara J; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y; Garg S; Regar E; De Bruyne B; Windecker S; McClean D; Thuesen L; Dudek D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Morel MA; de Vries T; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov; 3(11):1190-8. PubMed ID: 21087756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation in 3 months duration of neointimal coverage after zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation by optical coherence tomography: the ENDEAVOR OCT trial. Kim JS; Jang IK; Fan C; Kim TH; Kim JS; Park SM; Choi EY; Lee SH; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1240-7. PubMed ID: 20129551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Impact of Post-Procedural Asymmetry, Expansion, and Eccentricity of Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stent on Clinical Outcomes in the ABSORB II Trial. Suwannasom P; Sotomi Y; Ishibashi Y; Cavalcante R; Albuquerque FN; Macaya C; Ormiston JA; Hill J; Lang IM; Egred M; Fajadet J; Lesiak M; Tijssen JG; Wykrzykowska JJ; de Winter RJ; Chevalier B; Serruys PW; Onuma Y JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(12):1231-1242. PubMed ID: 27262861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold in coronary bifurcations: insights from bench testing. Džavík V; Colombo A JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 24332424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differences in neointimal thickness between the adluminal and the abluminal sides of malapposed and side-branch struts in a polylactide bioresorbable scaffold: evidence in vivo about the abluminal healing process. Gutiérrez-Chico JL; Gijsen F; Regar E; Wentzel J; de Bruyne B; Thuesen L; Ormiston J; McClean DR; Windecker S; Chevalier B; Dudek D; Whitbourn R; Brugaletta S; Onuma Y; Serruys PW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 22516401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. 3-year clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II trial (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). Garg S; Serruys P; Onuma Y; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Miquel-Hébert K; Sudhir K; Boland J; Huber K; Garcia E; te Riele JA; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1190-8. PubMed ID: 20129545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The SPIRIT V study: a clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. Grube E; Chevalier B; Smits P; Džavík V; Patel TM; Mullasari AS; Wöhrle J; Stuteville M; Dorange C; Kaul U; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Feb; 4(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 21349455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mechanical properties of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to the metallic everolimus-eluting stent. Dalos D; Gangl C; Roth C; Krenn L; Scherzer S; Vertesich M; Lang I; Maurer G; Neunteufl T; Berger R; Delle-Karth G BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 May; 16():104. PubMed ID: 27225486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Randomized Comparison of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and Mirage Microfiber Sirolimus-Eluting Scaffold Using Multimodality Imaging. Tenekecioglu E; Serruys PW; Onuma Y; Costa R; Chamié D; Sotomi Y; Yu TB; Abizaid A; Liew HB; Santoso T JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(11):1115-1130. PubMed ID: 28527768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results. Verheye S; Ormiston JA; Stewart J; Webster M; Sanidas E; Costa R; Costa JR; Chamie D; Abizaid AS; Pinto I; Morrison L; Toyloy S; Bhat V; Yan J; Abizaid A JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 24139932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Procedural and clinical outcomes of the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: one-month results of the Bioresorbable vascular Scaffold Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospitals (B-SEARCH). Simsek C; Magro M; Onuma Y; Boersma E; Smits P; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Regar E; Serruys PW; van Geuns RJ EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 23999210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dynamics of vessel wall changes following the implantation of the absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Serruys PW; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Muramatsu T; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Hebert KM; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA EuroIntervention; 2014 Mar; 9(11):1271-84. PubMed ID: 24291783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction). Brugaletta S; Gori T; Low AF; Tousek P; Pinar E; Gomez-Lara J; Scalone G; Schulz E; Chan MY; Kocka V; Hurtado J; Gomez-Hospital JA; Münzel T; Lee CH; Cequier A; Valdés M; Widimsky P; Serruys PW; Sabaté M JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt B):189-197. PubMed ID: 25616924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Serial in vivo intravascular ultrasound-based echogenicity changes of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold during the first 12 months after implantation insights from the ABSORB B trial. Brugaletta S; Gomez-Lara J; Serruys PW; Farooq V; van Geuns RJ; Thuesen L; Dudek D; Koolen J; Chevalier B; McClean D; Windecker S; Smits PC; de Bruyne B; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; van Domburg RT; Sihan K; de Winter S; Veldhof S; Miquel-Hebert K; Rapoza R; Garcia-Garcia HM; Ormiston JA; Bruining N JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1281-9. PubMed ID: 22192369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Incidence and Potential Mechanism(s) of Post-Procedural Rise of Cardiac Biomarker in Patients With Coronary Artery Narrowing After Implantation of an Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold or Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent. Ishibashi Y; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; Sotomi Y; Suwannasom P; Grundeken MJ; Cho YK; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Boven AJ; Piek JJ; Sabaté M; Helqvist S; Baumbach A; McClean D; de Sousa Almeida M; Wasungu L; Miquel-Hebert K; Dudek D; Chevalier B; Onuma Y; Serruys PW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jul; 8(8):1053-1063. PubMed ID: 26205444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of long-term in-stent vascular response between abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 3-year OCT follow-up from the TARGET I trial. Xu B; Zhang YJ; Sun ZW; Qiao SB; Chen SL; Zhang RY; Pan DR; Pang S; Zhang Q; Xu L; Yang YJ; Leon MB; Gao RL Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1489-96. PubMed ID: 26208685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial. Onuma Y; Sotomi Y; Shiomi H; Ozaki Y; Namiki A; Yasuda S; Ueno T; Ando K; Furuya J; Igarashi K; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Kusano H; Rapoza R; Popma JJ; Stone GW; Simonton C; Serruys PW; Kimura T EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(9):1090-1101. PubMed ID: 27597270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]