129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25523955)
1. Variations in the vestibular cortical bone of permanent canine teeth in orthodontic patients. a comparative study: linear tomography vs. cbct (3d accuitomo).
Mateu ME; Martínez ME; Dagum H; Benítez Rogé SC; Bruno GI; Hecht P; Folco AA
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2014; 27(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 25523955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning.
Zhang W; Skrypczak A; Weltman R
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 15():65. PubMed ID: 26059796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion.
Baka ZM; Akin M; Ucar FI; Ileri Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 25533073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines-a CBCT study.
Srebrzyńska-Witek A; Koszowski R; Różyło-Kalinowska I
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1567-1578. PubMed ID: 29063382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone density changes around teeth during orthodontic treatment.
Hsu JT; Chang HW; Huang HL; Yu JH; Li YF; Tu MG
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 20393863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of alveolar bone dimensions in unilateral palatally impacted canine: a cone-beam computed tomographic analyses.
Tadinada A; Mahdian M; Vishwanath M; Allareddy V; Upadhyay M; Yadav S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 25667038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
Park J; Cho HJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Peridental bone changes after orthodontic tooth movement with fixed appliances: A cone-beam computed tomographic study.
Jäger F; Mah JK; Bumann A
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):672-680. PubMed ID: 28553985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses.
Yan B; Sun Z; Fields H; Wang L; Luo L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 23561415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of marginal alveolar bone in the anterior mandible with pretreatment and posttreatment computed tomography in nonextraction patients.
Garlock DT; Buschang PH; Araujo EA; Behrents RG; Kim KB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 26827975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Multi-slice Spiral Computed Tomography Bone Density Measurements in the Maxilla and Mandible.
Doyle S; Wiltz MJ; Kraut RA
N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):42-5. PubMed ID: 26373034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are there bone dehiscences in maxillary canines orthodontically moved into the grafted alveolar cleft?
Yatabe MS; Ozawa TO; Janson G; Faco RA; Garib DG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):205-13. PubMed ID: 25636554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thickness of buccal bone in the mandible and its clinical significance in mono-cortical screws placement. A CBCT analysis.
Al-Jandan BA; Al-Sulaiman AA; Marei HF; Syed FA; Almana M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 22824249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reliability of using postero-anterior cephalometry and cone-beam CT to determine transverse dimensions in clinical practice.
Tai B; Goonewardene MS; Murray K; Koong B; Islam SM
Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 25549515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bolton tooth size ratio and its relation with arch widths, arch length and arch perimeter: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study.
Alam MK; Shahid F; Purmal K; Ahmad B; Khamis MF
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):1047-53. PubMed ID: 25220521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical bone thickness of the adult alveolar process--a retrospective CBCT study.
Germec-Cakan D; Tozlu M; Ozdemir F
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 24968646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
