These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25524475)

  • 1. Quality assessment of modeled protein structure using physicochemical properties.
    Rana PS; Sharma H; Bhattacharya M; Shukla A
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Apr; 13(2):1550005. PubMed ID: 25524475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical geometry based prediction of nonsynonymous SNP functional effects using random forest and neuro-fuzzy classifiers.
    Barenboim M; Masso M; Vaisman II; Jamison DC
    Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1930-9. PubMed ID: 18186470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating quality of template-based protein models by alignment stability.
    Chen H; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1255-74. PubMed ID: 18041762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sub-AQUA: real-value quality assessment of protein structure models.
    Yang YD; Spratt P; Chen H; Park C; Kihara D
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2010 Aug; 23(8):617-32. PubMed ID: 20525730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of solvent accessibility for aggregation-prone patches in protein folding.
    Mishra A; Ranganathan S; Jayaram B; Sattar A
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12896. PubMed ID: 30150761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MetaMQAP: a meta-server for the quality assessment of protein models.
    Pawlowski M; Gajda MJ; Matlak R; Bujnicki JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 9():403. PubMed ID: 18823532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of protein loop geometries in solution.
    Rapp CS; Strauss T; Nederveen A; Fuentes G
    Proteins; 2007 Oct; 69(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 17588228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of template-based modeling of protein structure in CASP11.
    Modi V; Xu Q; Adhikari S; Dunbrack RL
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):200-20. PubMed ID: 27081927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of protein structure models using network similarity score.
    Ghosh S; Gadiyaram V; Vishveshwara S
    Proteins; 2017 Sep; 85(9):1759-1776. PubMed ID: 28598579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Machine Learning-Based QSAR Model for Benzimidazole Derivatives as Corrosion Inhibitors by Incorporating Comprehensive Feature Selection.
    Liu Y; Guo Y; Wu W; Xiong Y; Sun C; Yuan L; Li M
    Interdiscip Sci; 2019 Dec; 11(4):738-747. PubMed ID: 31486019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-to-bin conversion for protein residue distances.
    Rahman J; Newton MAH; Hasan MAM; Sattar A
    Comput Biol Chem; 2023 Jun; 104():107834. PubMed ID: 36863243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SELECTpro: effective protein model selection using a structure-based energy function resistant to BLUNDERs.
    Randall A; Baldi P
    BMC Struct Biol; 2008 Dec; 8():52. PubMed ID: 19055744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmarking of TASSER in the ab initio limit.
    Borreguero JM; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17444524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.
    Zhang Y; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):702-10. PubMed ID: 15476259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.
    Zhang Y; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Biophys J; 2003 Aug; 85(2):1145-64. PubMed ID: 12885659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accelerated protein structure comparison using TM-score-GPU.
    Hung LH; Samudrala R
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Aug; 28(16):2191-2. PubMed ID: 22718788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of beta-turns at over 80% accuracy based on an ensemble of predicted secondary structures and multiple alignments.
    Zheng C; Kurgan L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():430. PubMed ID: 18847492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models.
    Eramian D; Shen MY; Devos D; Melo F; Sali A; Marti-Renom MA
    Protein Sci; 2006 Jul; 15(7):1653-66. PubMed ID: 16751606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. D2N: Distance to the native.
    Mishra A; Rana PS; Mittal A; Jayaram B
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 Oct; 1844(10):1798-807. PubMed ID: 25062912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.