197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25524722)
1. Baseball bats and chocolate chip cookies: the judicial treatment of DNA in the myriad genetics litigation.
Binnie I; Park-Thompson V
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2014 Dec; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 25524722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of Myriad and Mayo: will advancements in the biological sciences be spurred or disincentivized? (Or was biotech patenting not complicated enough?).
Gordon J
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2014 Dec; 5(5):a020917. PubMed ID: 25502748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law.
Bagley MA
William Mary Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 45(2):469-547. PubMed ID: 15570677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The History of Patenting Genetic Material.
Sherkow JS; Greely HT
Annu Rev Genet; 2015; 49():161-82. PubMed ID: 26442843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patents on random complementary DNA fragments?
Kiley TD
Science; 1992 Aug; 257(5072):915-8. PubMed ID: 1502558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is your reasonable expectation of success in obtaining pharmaceutical or biotechnology patents having nonobvious claimed inventions that the courts will uphold? An overview of obviousness court decisions.
Pereira DJ; Kunin SG
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2014 Dec; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 25475106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Myriad on the Future Development and Commercialization of DNA-Based Therapies and Diagnostics.
Wales M; Cartier E
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2015 Sep; 5(12):. PubMed ID: 26337114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clones war.
Nuell MJ; Nuell MJ
Food Drug Law J; 2011; 66(1):47-72, i-ii. PubMed ID: 24505846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intellectual property. Biotech feels a chill from changing U.S. patent rules.
Servick K
Science; 2014 Jul; 345(6192):14-5. PubMed ID: 24994626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. US Supreme Court rules on landmark gene patent case.
Sklan A
Pharm Pat Anal; 2013 Sep; 2(5):581. PubMed ID: 24237164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patentability of Stem Cells in the United States.
Fendrick SE; Zuhn DL
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2015 Aug; 5(12):. PubMed ID: 26292987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patent law--patent on life form--man-made modification of microorganism is patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101--Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 100 S.Ct. 2204 (1980).
Vidas S
Hamline Law Rev; 1981 Jan; 4(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 11650724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ordering life: law and the normalization of biotechnology.
Jasanoff S
Not Polit; 2001; 17(62):34-50. PubMed ID: 15468485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Supreme Court to Myriad Genetics: Synthetic DNA is Patentable but Isolated Genes Are Not.
Weinmeyer R; Klusty T
AMA J Ethics; 2015 Sep; 17(9):849-53. PubMed ID: 26390207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable.
Marshall E
Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gene patents, patenting life and the impact of court rulings on US stem cell patents and research.
Matthews KR; Cuchiara ML
Regen Med; 2014 Mar; 9(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 24750060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do recent US Supreme Court rulings on patenting of genes and genetic diagnostics affect the practice of genetic screening and diagnosis in prenatal and reproductive care?
Chandrasekharan S; McGuire AL; Van den Veyver IB
Prenat Diagn; 2014 Oct; 34(10):921-6. PubMed ID: 24989832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Human genes patents: yes or no? Reflections on the ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States].
Lacadena JR
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2013; (38):167-81. PubMed ID: 24340831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patent law--man-made, living microorganisms held patentable subject matter under section 101 of the Patent Act--Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980).
Faggen N
Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(2):308-30. PubMed ID: 11652407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patentable subject matter, TRIPS and the European Biotechnology Directive: Australia and patenting human genes.
Palombi L
Univ N S W Law J; 2003; 26(3):782-92. PubMed ID: 16617532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
