These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2552534)

  • 1. [How strongly does the radiation burden of diagnostic x-ray studies depend on the imaging technic?].
    Mini R
    Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 2552534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Radiation protection in diagnostic radiology].
    Mini R
    Ther Umsch; 1992 Jun; 49(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 1636159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Web-based tools for quality assurance and radiation protection in diagnostic radiology.
    Moores BM; Charnock P; Ward M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):422-9. PubMed ID: 20142276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Quality criteria in diagnostic radiology, goals and reality].
    St Stender H; Saure D
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 8580128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose and quality control (DQC) in diagnostic radiology.
    Holloway AF; Taylor KW; Hobbs BB
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Jun; 35(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 6480667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Latvian hospitals, analysis of radiographic techniques and comparison with European guidelines.
    Bogucarskis K; Salmins A; Gfirtner H; Anatschkowa E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):176-9. PubMed ID: 15933103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comments on 'Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for X-ray examinations' by P.C. Brennan, S. McDonnell and D. O'Leary.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Brennan PC; O'Leary D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):453-5. PubMed ID: 15769801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Basis of radiation protection].
    Roth J; Schweizer P; Gückel C
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jun; 126(26):1157-71. PubMed ID: 8711464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constancy check of beam quality in conventional diagnostic X-ray equipment.
    Costa AM; Badin RS; Leite MS; Caldas LV
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Oct; 66(10):1403-5. PubMed ID: 18434171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analysis of reject x-ray films as a quality assurance element in diagnostic radiology].
    Lewentat G; Bohndorf K
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 9198508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality assessment of radiological diagnostic examinations from the perspective of radiological protection].
    Staniszewska MA
    Med Pr; 1999; 50(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 10399713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adult reference levels in diagnostic and interventional radiology for temporary use in Switzerland.
    Aroua A; Besançon A; Buchillier-Decka I; Trueb P; Valley JF; Verdun FR; Zeller W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 15266081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The radiographer's role in increasing the efficiency of the diagnostic imaging department.
    Racoveanu NT
    Radiography; 1984; 50(592):151-8. PubMed ID: 6463221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient doses in different projections of conventional diagnostic X-ray examinations.
    Liu H; Zhuo W; Chen B; Yi Y; Li D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(3):334-8. PubMed ID: 18977775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Investigation on reduction of radiation dose and optimization of exposure parameters in radiography].
    Fei DS
    Zhonghua Fang She Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Apr; 23(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 2758928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. X-ray machine calibration: a study of failure rates.
    Pirtle OL
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(5):291-5; quiz 296-8. PubMed ID: 8058911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.