BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25525605)

  • 1. Multiparametric MRI-targeted TRUS prostate biopsies using visual registration.
    Puech P; Ouzzane A; Gaillard V; Betrouni N; Renard B; Villers A; Lemaitre L
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():819360. PubMed ID: 25525605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
    Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
    Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transrectal ultrasound-guided targeted biopsy of transition zone prostate cancer under cognitive registration with prebiopsy MRI and sonographic findings.
    Won SY; Cho NH; Choi YD; Park SY
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e21-157.e27. PubMed ID: 31677880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Venderink W; de Rooij M; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ; Fütterer JJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 28753777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision analysis model comparing cost of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. repeat biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in men with prior negative findings on biopsy.
    Lotan Y; Haddad AQ; Costa DN; Pedrosa I; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn CG
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):266.e9-16. PubMed ID: 25858102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: Quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis.
    Martin PR; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):073504. PubMed ID: 24989418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate with three functional techniques in patients with PSA elevation before initial TRUS-guided biopsy.
    Hauth E; Hohmuth H; Cozub-Poetica C; Bernand S; Beer M; Jaeger H
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150422. PubMed ID: 26268144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
    Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy techniques compared to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bass EJ; Pantovic A; Connor MJ; Loeb S; Rastinehad AR; Winkler M; Gabe R; Ahmed HU
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Feb; 25(2):174-179. PubMed ID: 34548624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies vs. systematic prostate biopsies in biopsy-naïve, previous negative biopsy patients and men undergoing active surveillance.
    Borghesi M; Bianchi L; Barbaresi U; Vagnoni V; Corcioni B; Gaudiano C; Fiorentino M; Giunchi F; Chessa F; Garofalo M; Bertaccini A; Angelini S; Ercolino A; Casablanca C; Droghetti M; Golfieri R; Schiavina R
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Jun; 73(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 33769008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of systematic prostate biopsies when performing transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy with needle tracking-what is the additional value?
    Günzel K; Magheli A; Busch J; Baco E; Cash H; Heinrich S; Edler D; Schostak M; Borgmann H; Schlegel J; Hinz S
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Oct; 54(10):2477-2483. PubMed ID: 35877030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters with histological findings from MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
    Dianat SS; Carter HB; Schaeffer EM; Hamper UM; Epstein JI; Macura KJ
    Can J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(5):7965-72. PubMed ID: 26432966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer: initial clinical experience with real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance and magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion.
    Fiard G; Hohn N; Descotes JL; Rambeaud JJ; Troccaz J; Long JA
    Urology; 2013 Jun; 81(6):1372-8. PubMed ID: 23540865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
    Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F
    J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The feasibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for targeted biopsy using novel navigation systems to detect early stage prostate cancer: the preliminary experience.
    Mouraviev V; Verma S; Kalyanaraman B; Zhai QJ; Gaitonde K; Pugnale M; Donovan JF
    J Endourol; 2013 Jul; 27(7):820-5. PubMed ID: 22966987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiattribute probabilistic prostate elastic registration (MAPPER): application to fusion of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sparks R; Bloch BN; Feleppa E; Barratt D; Moses D; Ponsky L; Madabhushi A
    Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1153-63. PubMed ID: 25735270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted versus three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsies: Size does matter.
    Peltier A; Aoun F; Albisinni S; Marcelis Q; Ledinh D; Paesmans M; Lemort M; van Velthoven R
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Jun; 50(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 26754860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies may improve diagnosis in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer.
    Winther MD; Balslev I; Boesen L; Logager V; Noergaard N; Thestrup KD; Thomsen HS
    Dan Med J; 2017 May; 64(5):. PubMed ID: 28552089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.