230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25525891)
1. Visual Performance of a Multifocal Contact Lens versus Monovision in Established Presbyopes.
Woods J; Woods C; Fonn D
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Feb; 92(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 25525891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early symptomatic presbyopes--what correction modality works best?
Woods J; Woods CA; Fonn D
Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 19675462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 2. Visual performance after 1 week of lens wear.
Bakaraju RC; Tilia D; Sha J; Diec J; Chung J; Kho D; Delaney S; Munro A; Thomas V
J Optom; 2018; 11(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 28619486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized Crossover Trial of Silicone Hydrogel Presbyopic Contact Lenses.
Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Feb; 93(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 26704141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia.
Sha J; Bakaraju RC; Tilia D; Chung J; Delaney S; Munro A; Ehrmann K; Thomas V; Holden BA
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2016 Apr; 79(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 27224066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term comparison between extended depth-of-focus prototype contact lenses and a commercially-available center-near multifocal.
Tilia D; Munro A; Chung J; Sha J; Delaney S; Kho D; Thomas V; Ehrmann K; Bakaraju RC
J Optom; 2017; 10(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 27161603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).
Durrie DS
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2006; 104():366-401. PubMed ID: 17471352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual Performance of Daily-disposable Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
Sha J; Tilia D; Kho D; Amrizal H; Diec J; Yeotikar N; Jong M; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1096-1104. PubMed ID: 30451806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-Term Visual Performance of Novel Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.
Tilia D; Bakaraju RC; Chung J; Sha J; Delaney S; Munro A; Thomas V; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Apr; 93(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 26808384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Myopic astigmatism and presbyopia trial.
Savage H; Rothstein M; Davuluri G; El Ghormli L; Zaetta DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 135(5):628-32. PubMed ID: 12719069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision.
Gupta N; Naroo SA; Wolffsohn JS
Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 86(2):E98-105. PubMed ID: 19156009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the utility of clinical assessments to predict success with presbyopic contact lens correction.
Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):322-30. PubMed ID: 27237964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multifocal versus modified monovision corrections: A non-dispensing comparison of visual assessment in presbyopic neophytes.
Parekh D; Asokan R; Purkait S; Iqbal A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 71(5):1837-1842. PubMed ID: 37203039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of conventional versus crossed monovision in pseudophakia.
Kim J; Shin HJ; Kim HC; Shin KC
Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 99(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 25287366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new method to analyse the effect of multifocal contact lenses on visual function.
Sanchez I; Ortiz-Toquero S; Blanco M; Martin R
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Apr; 41(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 29217455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual performance of single vision and multifocal contact lenses in non-presbyopic myopic eyes.
Fedtke C; Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K; Chung J; Thomas V; Holden BA
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Feb; 39(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26228543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
