These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25525920)

  • 1. Post hoc analyses: after the facts.
    Srinivas TR; Ho B; Kang J; Kaplan B
    Transplantation; 2015 Jan; 99(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 25525920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical considerations for testing multiple endpoints in group sequential or adaptive clinical trials.
    Hung HM; Wang SJ; O'Neill R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1201-10. PubMed ID: 18027226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian design and analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials with multiple dependent binary outcomes.
    Zaslavsky BG
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 23625660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design, data monitoring, and analysis of clinical trials with co-primary endpoints: A review.
    Hamasaki T; Evans SR; Asakura K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(1):28-51. PubMed ID: 29083951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A free gift: an adaptive strategy in a single-arm trial using an exact test through the binomial distribution.
    Wang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1127-36. PubMed ID: 23075012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On sample size determination in multi-armed confirmatory adaptive designs.
    Wassmer G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):802-17. PubMed ID: 21516570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test for the consistency of noninferiority from multiple clinical trials.
    Yan X; Wang MC; Su X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 17365223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size determination in superiority clinical trials with multiple co-primary correlated endpoints.
    Sozu T; Sugimoto T; Hamasaki T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):650-68. PubMed ID: 21516562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power and sample size considerations in clinical trials with competing risk endpoints.
    Maki E
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 17080750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What we want versus what we can get: a closer look at failure time endpoints for cardiovascular studies.
    Song R; Cook TD; Kosorok MR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18327727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A convenient formula for sample size calculations in clinical trials with multiple co-primary continuous endpoints.
    Sugimoto T; Sozu T; Hamasaki T
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 22415870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptive methods: telling "the rest of the story".
    Emerson SS; Fleming TR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1150-65. PubMed ID: 21058111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-arm noninferiority trials with a prespecified margin for inference of the difference in the proportions of binary endpoints.
    Hida E; Tango T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):774-89. PubMed ID: 23799810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and analysis issues of multiregional clinical trials with different regional primary endpoints.
    Tsou HH; Tsong Y; Chang WJ; Dong X; Hsiao CF
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012 Sep; 22(5):1051-9. PubMed ID: 22946949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical considerations for the next generation of clinical trials.
    Wu W; Shi Q; Sargent DJ
    Semin Oncol; 2011 Aug; 38(4):598-604. PubMed ID: 21810519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planning and evaluating clinical trials with composite time-to-first-event endpoints in a competing risk framework.
    Rauch G; Beyersmann J
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(21):3595-608. PubMed ID: 23553898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A consistency-adjusted strategy for accommodating an underpowered primary endpoint.
    Huque MF; Alosh M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(1):160-79. PubMed ID: 22204533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis strategies for adaptive designs with multiple endpoints.
    Chang M; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1189-200. PubMed ID: 18027225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power and sample size for clinical trials when efficacy is required in multiple endpoints: application to an Alzheimer's treatment trial.
    Xiong C; Yu K; Gao F; Yan Y; Zhang Z
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 16317808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple-arm superiority and non-inferiority designs with various endpoints.
    Chang M
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17323311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.