BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25526761)

  • 1. Corporate influence and conflicts of interest: assessment of veterinary medical curricular changes and student perceptions.
    Dowers KL; Schoenfeld-Tacher RM; Hellyer PW; Kogan LR
    J Vet Med Educ; 2015; 42(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25526761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical students' attitudes toward interactions with the pharmaceutical industry: a national survey in Japan.
    Saito S; Maeno T; Miyata Y; Maeno T
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Dec; 18(1):286. PubMed ID: 30509273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of educational interventions and medical school policies on medical students' attitudes toward pharmaceutical marketing practices: a multi-institutional study.
    Kao AC; Braddock C; Clay M; Elliott D; Epstein SK; Filstead W; Hotze T; May W; Reenan J
    Acad Med; 2011 Nov; 86(11):1454-62. PubMed ID: 21952057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical student views on interactions with pharmaceutical representatives.
    Ganzini L; Chen Z; Peters D; Misra S; Macht M; Osborne M; Keepers G
    Acad Psychiatry; 2012 May; 36(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 22751818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Teaching appropriate interactions with pharmaceutical company representatives: the impact of an innovative workshop on student attitudes.
    Wofford JL; Ohl CA
    BMC Med Educ; 2005 Feb; 5(1):5. PubMed ID: 15698480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association of medical students' reports of interactions with the pharmaceutical and medical device industries and medical school policies and characteristics: a cross-sectional study.
    Yeh JS; Austad KE; Franklin JM; Chimonas S; Campbell EG; Avorn J; Kesselheim AS
    PLoS Med; 2014 Oct; 11(10):e1001743. PubMed ID: 25314155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conflict of interest policies at Belgian medical faculties: Cross-sectional study indicates little oversight.
    Bechoux L; De Vleeschouwer O; Vanheuverzwijn C; Verhegghen F; Detiffe A; Colle F; Fallon C; Thoreau F
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245736. PubMed ID: 33566836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. My thoughts on teaching.
    Smith BJ
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 19861711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In the students' own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum?
    Henzi D; Davis E; Jasinevicius R; Hendricson W
    J Dent Educ; 2007 May; 71(5):632-45. PubMed ID: 17493972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationships between drug company representatives and medical students: medical school policies and attitudes of student affairs deans and third-year medical students.
    Sierles F; Brodkey A; Cleary L; McCurdy FA; Mintz M; Frank J; Lynn DJ; Chao J; Morgenstern B; Shore W; Woodard J
    Acad Psychiatry; 2009; 33(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 19933893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical students' exposure to and attitudes about drug company interactions: a national survey.
    Sierles FS; Brodkey AC; Cleary LM; McCurdy FA; Mintz M; Frank J; Lynn DJ; Chao J; Morgenstern BZ; Shore W; Woodard JL
    JAMA; 2005 Sep; 294(9):1034-42. PubMed ID: 16145023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What do dental students think about mandatory laptop programs?
    Hendricson W; Eisenberg E; Guest G; Jones P; Johnson L; Panagakos F; McDonald J; Cintron L
    J Dent Educ; 2006 May; 70(5):480-99. PubMed ID: 16687633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using the tool for assessing cultural competence training (TACCT) to measure faculty and medical student perceptions of cultural competence instruction in the first three years of the curriculum.
    Lie D; Boker J; Cleveland E
    Acad Med; 2006 Jun; 81(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 16728806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exposure of medical students to pharmaceutical marketing in primary care settings: frequent and influential.
    Sarikaya O; Civaner M; Vatansever K
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 Dec; 14(5):713-24. PubMed ID: 19184498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The hidden curriculum: medical students' changing opinions toward the pharmaceutical industry.
    Fitz MM; Homan D; Reddy S; Griffith CH; Baker E; Simpson KP
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S1-3. PubMed ID: 17895670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The updated AMSA scorecard of conflict-of-interest policies: a survey of U.S. medical schools.
    Carlat DJ; Fagrelius T; Ramachandran R; Ross JS; Bergh S
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Aug; 16(1):202. PubMed ID: 27519253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in medical students' exposure to and attitudes about drug company interactions from 2003 to 2012: a multi-institutional follow-up survey.
    Sierles FS; Kessler KH; Mintz M; Beck G; Starr S; Lynn DJ; Chao J; Cleary LM; Shore W; Stengel TL; Brodkey AC
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1137-46. PubMed ID: 25785675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial evaluation of rural programs at the Australian National University: understanding the effects of rural programs on intentions for rural and remote medical practice.
    Lee YH; Barnard A; Owen C
    Rural Remote Health; 2011; 11(2):1602. PubMed ID: 21568620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conflicts of interest in medical school: missing policies and high need for student information at most German universities.
    Lieb K; Koch C
    GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2014; 31(1):Doc10. PubMed ID: 24575152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Veterinary students' perceptions of their day-one abilities before and after final-year clinical practice-based training.
    Schull DN; Morton JM; Coleman GT; Mills PC
    J Vet Med Educ; 2011; 38(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 22023977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.