These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Integrating cognitive process and descriptive models of attitudes and preferences. Hawkins GE; Marley AA; Heathcote A; Flynn TN; Louviere JJ; Brown SD Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(4):701-35. PubMed ID: 24124986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Explaining how the mind works: on the relation between cognitive science and philosophy. Trigg J; Kalish M Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Apr; 3(2):399-424. PubMed ID: 25164301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Issues or Identity? Cognitive Foundations of Voter Choice. Jenke L; Huettel SA Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 20(11):794-804. PubMed ID: 27769726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Useful theories make predictions. Howes A Top Cogn Sci; 2012 Jan; 4(1):84-6; discussion 94-102. PubMed ID: 22253181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applying Mathematical Optimization Methods to an ACT-R Instance-Based Learning Model. Said N; Engelhart M; Kirches C; Körkel S; Holt DV PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158832. PubMed ID: 27387139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of testosterone and estrogen in consumer behavior and social & economic decision making: A review. Stanton SJ Horm Behav; 2017 Jun; 92():155-163. PubMed ID: 27840103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A dynamic context model of interactive behavior. Fu WT Cogn Sci; 2011 Jul; 35(5):874-904. PubMed ID: 21736603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Representing task context: proposals based on a connectionist model of action. Botvinick M; Plaut DC Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):298-311. PubMed ID: 12466927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mindful judgment and decision making. Weber EU; Johnson EJ Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():53-85. PubMed ID: 18798706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why cognitive science needs philosophy and vice versa. Thagard P Top Cogn Sci; 2009 Apr; 1(2):237-54. PubMed ID: 25164930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of branding on preference-based decision making. Philiastides MG; Ratcliff R Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1208-15. PubMed ID: 23696199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The gut chooses faster than the mind: a latency advantage of affective over cognitive decisions. Saunders TS; Buehner MJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 22950824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The complex systems approach: rhetoric or revolution. Eliasmith C Top Cogn Sci; 2012 Jan; 4(1):72-7; discussion 94-102. PubMed ID: 22253179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Post choice information integration as a causal determinant of confidence: Novel data and a computational account. Moran R; Teodorescu AR; Usher M Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():99-147. PubMed ID: 25868113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Not just for consumers: context effects are fundamental to decision making. Trueblood JS; Brown SD; Heathcote A; Busemeyer JR Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 23610134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rethinking the cognitive revolution from a neural perspective: how overuse/misuse of the term 'cognition' and the neglect of affective controls in behavioral neuroscience could be delaying progress in understanding the BrainMind. Cromwell HC; Panksepp J Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2011 Oct; 35(9):2026-35. PubMed ID: 21345347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary: why I am not a dynamicist. Botvinick M Top Cogn Sci; 2012 Jan; 4(1):78-83; discussion 94-102. PubMed ID: 22253180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]