These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25527418)

  • 21. Metrics for Original Research Articles in the AJR: From First Submission to Final Publication.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Harisinghani M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1152-6. PubMed ID: 26001223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reviewing scientific manuscripts.
    Curzon ME; Cleaton-Jones PE
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2011 Aug; 12(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 21806901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does "Decision Fatigue" Impact Manuscript Acceptance? An Analysis of Editorial Decisions by the American Journal of Gastroenterology.
    Kwan J; Stein L; Delshad S; Johl S; Park H; Martinez B; Topp L; Spiegel BM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 111(11):1511-1512. PubMed ID: 27725653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of peer review on the improvement of rejected manuscripts.
    Crijns TJ; Ottenhoff JSE; Ring D
    Account Res; 2021 Nov; 28(8):517-527. PubMed ID: 33393365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers.
    Navalta JW; Lyons TS
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Dec; 34(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 21098383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Discovering the Benefits of Group Peer Review of Submitted Manuscripts.
    Richards BF; Cardell EM; Chow CJ; Moore KB; Moorman KL; O'Connor M; Hart SE
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(1):104-109. PubMed ID: 31545096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. To accept or reject? A guide to peer reviewing of medical journal papers.
    Einarson TR; Koren G
    J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol; 2012; 19(2):e328-33. PubMed ID: 22885272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study.
    van Lent M; IntHout J; Out HJ
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e007961. PubMed ID: 26423849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does online submission of manuscripts improve efficiency?
    Govender P; Buckley O; McAuley G; O'Brien J; Torreggiani WC
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):231-4. PubMed ID: 19202995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions.
    Garfunkel JM; Ulshen MH; Hamrick HJ; Lawson EE
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 8015125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review.
    Levine AM; Heckman JD; Hensinger RN
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():679-88. PubMed ID: 15116658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How to Get Your Paper Published in JVIR.
    Haskal ZJ; Coler E
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1456-8. PubMed ID: 26408213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An audit of the editorial process and peer review in the journal Clinical rehabilitation.
    Wade D; Tennant A
    Clin Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 18(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 15053119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: Comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness.
    Henly SJ; Bennett JA; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):188-99. PubMed ID: 20637932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reviewing scientific manuscripts.
    Castagnetti M; Bagli D; Fossum M;
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Apr; 14(2):133-134. PubMed ID: 29429827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Guidelines for writing manuscripts about community-based participatory research for peer-reviewed journals.
    Bordeaux BC; Wiley C; Tandon SD; Horowitz CR; Brown PB; Bass EB
    Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2007; 1(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 20208291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. With great power comes great responsibility: the importance of rejection, power, and editors in the practice of scientific publishing.
    Lortie CJ; Allesina S; Aarssen L; Grod O; Budden AE
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e85382. PubMed ID: 24386471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
    Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
    Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ten steps to getting your paper published in a professional journal.
    Devitt P; Hardicre J; Coad J
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Mar 8-21; 16(5):290-1. PubMed ID: 17505375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.