These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25528014)

  • 21. Word recognition and syntactic attachment in reading: evidence for a staged architecture.
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Aug; 140(3):407-33. PubMed ID: 21604914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Eye movements during reading of randomly shuffled text.
    Schad DJ; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
    Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2600-16. PubMed ID: 20719240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of contextual diversity on eye movements in Chinese sentence reading.
    Chen Q; Huang X; Bai L; Xu X; Yang Y; Tanenhaus MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):510-518. PubMed ID: 27432001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.
    Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB; White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1714-1729. PubMed ID: 29672115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of word shading and word length on eye movements during reading.
    Leyland LA; Kirkby JA; Juhasz BJ; Pollatsek A; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):471-86. PubMed ID: 21988376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M; Demetriou C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Dec; 66(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 22686154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading.
    Schuster S; Hawelka S; Hutzler F; Kronbichler M; Richlan F
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3889-3904. PubMed ID: 27365297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Decision and metrics of refixations in reading isolated words.
    Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Doré-Mazars K
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):2009-17. PubMed ID: 15149834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Word length effects on novel words: evidence from eye movements.
    Lowell R; Morris RK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 24092359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Oculomotor and linguistic processing effects in reading dynamic horizontally scrolling text.
    Harvey H; Godwin HJ; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP; Walker R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):518-536. PubMed ID: 28080114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.
    Schotter ER; Bicknell K; Howard I; Levy R; Rayner K
    Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 24434024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can colours be used to segment words when reading?
    Perea M; Tejero P; Winskel H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():8-13. PubMed ID: 26002618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Word length and frequency effects on children's eye movements during silent reading.
    Tiffin-Richards SP; Schroeder S
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt A):33-43. PubMed ID: 26048684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading.
    Ma G; Li X; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1409-19. PubMed ID: 26168144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing.
    Sheridan H; Reichle ED; Reingold EM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1543-1552. PubMed ID: 26801166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.
    White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18248149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
    Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Aging and the use of interword spaces during reading: evidence from eye movements.
    McGowan VA; White SJ; Jordan TR; Paterson KB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):740-7. PubMed ID: 24101571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading.
    Luo Y; Yan M; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):915-30. PubMed ID: 22774853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.