These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25528089)

  • 1. Is it harder to switch among a larger set of tasks?
    van 't Wout F; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):363-76. PubMed ID: 25528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
    Forrest CL; Monsell S; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1002-24. PubMed ID: 24564543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Across-task long-term priming: interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval.
    Waszak F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1414-29. PubMed ID: 20043270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are stimulus-response rules represented phonologically for task-set preparation and maintenance?
    van 't Wout F; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1538-51. PubMed ID: 23421514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cue-task associations in task switching.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 17514592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost.
    Arbuthnott KD; Woodward TS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 11901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?
    Mädebach A; Oppermann F; Hantsch A; Curda C; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):522-38. PubMed ID: 21299323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantic influences from a brief peripheral cue depend on task set.
    Weaver MD; Phillips J; Lauwereyns J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1249-55. PubMed ID: 20419568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. More attention to attention? An eye-tracking investigation of selection of perceptual attributes during a task switch.
    Longman CS; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1142-51. PubMed ID: 23088543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression.
    Meiran N; Hsieh S; Dimov E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):992-1002. PubMed ID: 20565214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs".
    Wylie G; Allport A
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(3-4):212-33. PubMed ID: 11004877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bivalent task switching and memory load: Similar costs on reaction times, different costs on concurrent timing.
    Viau-Quesnel C; Fortin C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Sep; 68(3):194-203. PubMed ID: 25383477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?
    Los SA; Van der Burg E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1895-915. PubMed ID: 20401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?
    Hsieh S; Liu LC
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related effects in prospective memory are modulated by ongoing task complexity and relation to target cue.
    Rendell PG; McDaniel MA; Forbes RD; Einstein GO
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 May; 14(3):236-56. PubMed ID: 17453559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.