These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25528101)

  • 1. Judgments of learning as memory modifiers.
    Soderstrom NC; Clark CT; Halamish V; Bjork EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):553-8. PubMed ID: 25528101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.
    Dunlosky J; Matvey G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1180-91. PubMed ID: 11550746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
    Illman NA; Morrison CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention.
    Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition.
    Zaromb FM; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):552-7. PubMed ID: 20192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does ADHD in adults affect the relative accuracy of metamemory judgments?
    Knouse LE; Paradise MJ; Dunlosky J
    J Atten Disord; 2006 Nov; 10(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 17085626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.
    Frank DJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 27709983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple bases for young and older adults' judgments of learning in multitrial learning.
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):474-83. PubMed ID: 21942899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments.
    Halamish V; Undorf M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):547-556. PubMed ID: 36006723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 30859406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: the utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning.
    Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 18426071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attributing study effort to data-driven and goal-driven effects: implications for metacognitive judgments.
    Koriat A; Nussinson R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1338-43. PubMed ID: 19686026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
    Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The testing effect as a function of explicit testing instructions and judgments of learning.
    Jönsson FU; Hedner M; Olsson MJ
    Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):251-7. PubMed ID: 22580409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.