BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

589 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25528466)

  • 1. A Bayesian prediction model between a biomarker and the clinical endpoint for dichotomous variables.
    Jiang Z; Song Y; Shou Q; Xia J; Wang W
    Trials; 2014 Dec; 15():500. PubMed ID: 25528466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian approach to noninferiority trials for proportions.
    Gamalo MA; Wu R; Tiwari RC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Sep; 21(5):902-19. PubMed ID: 21830922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A hybrid Bayesian adaptive design for dose response trials.
    Chang M; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):677-91. PubMed ID: 16022172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analytical approach to assess the predictive value of biomarkers in Phase II decision making.
    Nikolakopoulos S; van der Wal WM; Roes KC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1106-23. PubMed ID: 23957519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation optimization for Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial with binary endpoints.
    Yu Z; Ramakrishnan V; Meinzer C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):306-317. PubMed ID: 30763151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian estimate of the concordance correlation coefficient with skewed data.
    Feng D; Baumgartner R; Svetnik V
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(4):350-8. PubMed ID: 26033433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian adjusted R2 for the meta-analytic evaluation of surrogate time-to-event endpoints in clinical trials.
    Renfro LA; Shi Q; Sargent DJ; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(8):743-61. PubMed ID: 22161275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust meta-analytic-predictive priors in clinical trials with historical control information.
    Schmidli H; Gsteiger S; Roychoudhury S; O'Hagan A; Spiegelhalter D; Neuenschwander B
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1023-32. PubMed ID: 25355546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive probability of success using surrogate endpoints.
    Saint-Hilary G; Barboux V; Pannaux M; Gasparini M; Robert V; Mastrantonio G
    Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(10):1753-1774. PubMed ID: 30548627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian model selection techniques as decision support for shaping a statistical analysis plan of a clinical trial: an example from a vertigo phase III study with longitudinal count data as primary endpoint.
    Adrion C; Mansmann U
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Sep; 12():137. PubMed ID: 22962944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring event times in early phase clinical trials: some practical issues.
    Thall PF; Wooten LH; Tannir NM
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(6):467-78. PubMed ID: 16422307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
    Odani M; Fukimbara S; Sato T
    Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 28059578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian design and analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials with multiple dependent binary outcomes.
    Zaslavsky BG
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 23625660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence synthesis from aggregate recurrent event data for clinical trial design and analysis.
    Holzhauer B; Wang C; Schmidli H
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(6):867-882. PubMed ID: 29152777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Bayesian predictive sample size selection design for single-arm exploratory clinical trials.
    Teramukai S; Daimon T; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4243-54. PubMed ID: 22807115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian approach for assessing noninferiority in a three-arm trial with binary endpoint.
    Ghosh S; Tiwari RC; Ghosh S
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Jul; 17(4):342-357. PubMed ID: 29473291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting analysis time in event-driven clinical trials with event-reporting lag.
    Wang J; Ke C; Jiang Q; Zhang C; Snapinn S
    Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(9):801-11. PubMed ID: 22344853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the relationship between the causal-inference and meta-analytic paradigms for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints.
    Van der Elst W; Molenberghs G; Alonso A
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(8):1281-98. PubMed ID: 26612787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian basket trial design using a calibrated Bayesian hierarchical model.
    Chu Y; Yuan Y
    Clin Trials; 2018 Apr; 15(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 29499621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Milestone prediction for time-to-event endpoint monitoring in clinical trials.
    Ou FS; Heller M; Shi Q
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Jul; 18(4):433-446. PubMed ID: 30806485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.