These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25528538)

  • 1. Monitoring of learning at the category level when learning a natural concept: will task experience improve its resolution?
    Tauber SK; Dunlosky J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():8-18. PubMed ID: 25528538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do people use category-learning judgments to regulate their learning of natural categories?
    Morehead K; Dunlosky J; Foster NL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1253-1269. PubMed ID: 28707177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metacognitive monitoring during category learning: how success affects future behaviour.
    Doyle ME; Hourihan KL
    Memory; 2016 Oct; 24(9):1197-207. PubMed ID: 26377626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nothing compares: Unraveling learning task effects in judgment and categorization.
    Trippas D; Pachur T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2239-2266. PubMed ID: 30998071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidental auditory category learning.
    Gabay Y; Dick FK; Zevin JD; Holt LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1124-38. PubMed ID: 26010588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perceptual effects of learning object categories that predict perceptual goals.
    Van Gulick AE; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1307-20. PubMed ID: 24820671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study preferences for exemplar variability in self-regulated category learning.
    Wahlheim CN; DeSoto KA
    Memory; 2017 Feb; 25(2):231-243. PubMed ID: 26915279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-regulated learning of a natural category: do people interleave or block exemplars during study?
    Tauber SK; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA; Wahlheim CN; Jacoby LL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 23055143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differing effects of gain and loss feedback on rule-based and information-integration category learning.
    Liu Z; Zhang Y; Ma D; Xu Q; Seger CA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):274-282. PubMed ID: 33006121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning from observation, feedback, and intervention in linear and non-linear task environments.
    Henriksson MP; Enkvist T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):545-561. PubMed ID: 27882857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is retrieval the key? Metamemory judgment and testing as learning strategies.
    Akdoğan E; Izaute M; Danion JM; Vidailhet P; Bacon E
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1390-5. PubMed ID: 26606714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental changes and the effect of self-generated feedback in metacognitive controlled spacing strategies in 7-year-olds, 10-year-olds, and adults.
    Tsalas N; Paulus M; Sodian B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Apr; 132():140-54. PubMed ID: 25703006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: evidence for variability neglect.
    Wahlheim CN; Finn B; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):703-16. PubMed ID: 22282159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How should exemplars be sequenced in inductive learning? Empirical evidence versus learners' opinions.
    Yan VX; Soderstrom NC; Seneviratna GS; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):403-416. PubMed ID: 28816472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.
    Cook RG; Smith JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1059-67. PubMed ID: 17201788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collaboration facilitates abstract category learning.
    Richey JE; Nokes-Malach TJ; Cohen K
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jul; 46(5):685-698. PubMed ID: 29427208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the effects of positive and negative feedback in information-integration category learning.
    Freedberg M; Glass B; Filoteo JV; Hazeltine E; Maddox WT
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 27457097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-enhanced learning of natural concepts: effects on recognition memory, classification, and metacognition.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN; Coane JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1441-51. PubMed ID: 20804279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Category learning in Alzheimer's disease and normal cognitive aging depends on initial experience of feature variability.
    Phillips JS; McMillan CT; Smith EE; Grossman M
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():98-110. PubMed ID: 27394151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of evidence in a categorization task: analytic and holistic processing modes.
    Greco A; Moretti S
    Cogn Process; 2017 Nov; 18(4):431-446. PubMed ID: 28808826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.