226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25529239)
1. Biomechanical implications of intraspecific shape variation in chimpanzee crania: moving toward an integration of geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis.
Smith AL; Benazzi S; Ledogar JA; Tamvada K; Pryor Smith LC; Weber GW; Spencer MA; Dechow PC; Grosse IR; Ross CF; Richmond BG; Wright BW; Wang Q; Byron C; Slice DE; Strait DS
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2015 Jan; 298(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 25529239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between skull morphology, masticatory muscle force and cranial skeletal deformation during biting.
Toro-Ibacache V; Zapata Muñoz V; O'Higgins P
Ann Anat; 2016 Jan; 203():59-68. PubMed ID: 25829126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Masticatory loadings and cranial deformation in Macaca fascicularis: a finite element analysis sensitivity study.
Fitton LC; Shi JF; Fagan MJ; O'Higgins P
J Anat; 2012 Jul; 221(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 22690885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Varying Jaw-elevator Muscle Forces on a Finite Element Model of a Human Cranium.
Toro-Ibacache V; O'Higgins P
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2016 Jul; 299(7):828-39. PubMed ID: 27111484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling masticatory muscle force in finite element analysis: sensitivity analysis using principal coordinates analysis.
Ross CF; Patel BA; Slice DE; Strait DS; Dechow PC; Richmond BG; Spencer MA
Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol; 2005 Apr; 283(2):288-99. PubMed ID: 15747351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional geometric morphometric analysis of masticatory system ontogeny in papionin primates.
Singleton M
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2015 Jan; 298(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 25338826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite element modelling of squirrel, guinea pig and rat skulls: using geometric morphometrics to assess sensitivity.
Cox PG; Fagan MJ; Rayfield EJ; Jeffery N
J Anat; 2011 Dec; 219(6):696-709. PubMed ID: 21974720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The shrew tamed by Wolff's law: do functional constraints shape the skull through muscle and bone covariation?
Cornette R; Tresset A; Herrel A
J Morphol; 2015 Mar; 276(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 25385121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between cranial structure, biomechanical performance and ecological diversity in varanoid lizards.
McCurry MR; Mahony M; Clausen PD; Quayle MR; Walmsley CW; Jessop TS; Wroe S; Richards H; McHenry CR
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130625. PubMed ID: 26106889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of simplifications on the performance of a finite element model of a Macaca fascicularis cranium.
Fitton LC; PrôA M; Rowland C; Toro-Ibacache V; O'higgins P
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2015 Jan; 298(1):107-21. PubMed ID: 25339306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: a comparison of cranial growth in Pan paniscus versus Pan troglodytes.
Mitteroecker P; Gunz P; Bookstein FL
Evol Dev; 2005; 7(3):244-58. PubMed ID: 15876197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular shape diversity in Pan.
Robinson C
J Hum Evol; 2012 Jul; 63(1):191-204. PubMed ID: 22682959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A geometric morphometric analysis of heterochrony in the cranium of chimpanzees and bonobos.
Lieberman DE; Carlo J; Ponce de León M; Zollikofer CP
J Hum Evol; 2007 Jun; 52(6):647-62. PubMed ID: 17298840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ontogenetic allometry, heterochrony, and interspecific differences in the skull of African apes, using tridimensional Procrustes analysis.
Berge C; Penin X
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Jun; 124(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 15160366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dry versus wet and gross: Comparisons between the dry skull method and gross dissection in estimations of jaw muscle cross-sectional area and bite forces in sea otters.
Law CJ; Mehta RS
J Morphol; 2019 Nov; 280(11):1706-1713. PubMed ID: 31513299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the Giles hypothesis using geometric morphometrics.
Simons EA
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2021 Apr; 174(4):744-751. PubMed ID: 33393687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Allometric and metameric shape variation in Pan mandibular molars: a digital morphometric analysis.
Singleton M; Rosenberger AL; Robinson C; O'neill R
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2011 Feb; 294(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 21235007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional implications of squamosal suture size in paranthropus boisei.
Dzialo C; Wood SA; Berthaume M; Smith A; Dumont ER; Benazzi S; Weber GW; Strait DS; Grosse IR
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Feb; 153(2):260-8. PubMed ID: 24242913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling the human mandible under masticatory loads: which input variables are important?
Gröning F; Fagan M; O'Higgins P
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2012 May; 295(5):853-63. PubMed ID: 22467624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Covariation in the human masticatory apparatus.
Noback ML; Harvati K
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2015 Jan; 298(1):64-84. PubMed ID: 25338706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
