These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25530793)

  • 21. Familiarity influences body darkening in territorial disputes between juvenile salmon.
    O'Connor KI; Metcalfe NB; Taylor AC
    Anim Behav; 2000 Jun; 59(6):1095-1101. PubMed ID: 10877887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Third-party intervention and post-conflict behaviour in agonistic encounters of pigs (Sus scrofa).
    Maffezzini N; Turner SP; Bolhuis JE; Arnott G; Camerlink I
    Front Zool; 2023 Aug; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 37592308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Why do winners keep winning? Androgen mediation of winner but not loser effects in cichlid fish.
    Oliveira RF; Silva A; Canário AV
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Jun; 276(1665):2249-56. PubMed ID: 19324741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The hidden links between animal weapons, fighting style, and their effect on contest success: a meta-analysis.
    Palaoro AV; Peixoto PEC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Oct; 97(5):1948-1966. PubMed ID: 35790073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of recent experience and weight on hen's agonistic behaviour during dyadic conflict resolution.
    Martin F; Beaugrand JP; Laguë PC
    Behav Processes; 1997 Nov; 41(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 24896672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Previous experience and contest outcome: winner effects persist in absence of evident loser effects in a parasitoid wasp.
    Goubault M; Decuignière M
    Am Nat; 2012 Sep; 180(3):364-71. PubMed ID: 22854079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What sets the odds of winning and losing?
    Rutte C; Taborsky M; Brinkhof MW
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2006 Jan; 21(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 16701465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of age and experience on contest behavior in the burying beetle,
    Lee VE; Head ML; Carter MJ; Royle NJ
    Behav Ecol; 2014 Jan; 25(1):172-179. PubMed ID: 24347998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Real or fake? Natural and artificial social stimuli elicit divergent behavioural and neural responses in mangrove rivulus,
    Li CY; Hofmann HA; Harris ML; Earley RL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Nov; 285(1891):. PubMed ID: 30429304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcomes of agonistic interactions alter sheltering behavior in crayfish.
    Mathews L
    Behav Processes; 2021 Mar; 184():104337. PubMed ID: 33515634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Learning your own strength: winner and loser effects should change with age and experience.
    Fawcett TW; Johnstone RA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 May; 277(1686):1427-34. PubMed ID: 20053644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Complex strategies: an integrative analysis of contests in Siamese fighting fish.
    Kareklas K; Kunc HP; Arnott G
    BMC Zool; 2022 Dec; 7(1):59. PubMed ID: 37170148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does losing reduce the tendency to engage with rivals to reach mates? An experimental test.
    Zang C; Chung MJ; Neeman T; Harrison L; Vinogradov IM; Jennions MD
    Behav Ecol; 2024; 35(4):arae037. PubMed ID: 38779595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dominance between booby nestlings involves winner and loser effects.
    Drummond H; Canales C
    Anim Behav; 1998 Jun; 55(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 9642010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dear enemies and nasty neighbors in crayfish: effects of social status and sex on responses to familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics.
    Tierney AJ; Andrews K; Happer KR; White MK
    Behav Processes; 2013 Oct; 99():47-51. PubMed ID: 23769936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Strategy changes in subsequent fights as consequences of winning and losing in fruit fly fights.
    Trannoy S; Kravitz EA
    Fly (Austin); 2017 Apr; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27834611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the evolution of pure winner and loser effects: a game-theoretic model.
    Mesterton-Gibbons M
    Bull Math Biol; 1999 Nov; 61(6):1151-86. PubMed ID: 17879874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Status-Dependent Vasotocin Modulation of Dominance and Subordination in the Weakly Electric Fish
    Perrone R; Silva AC
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2018; 12():1. PubMed ID: 29403366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Effect of Brief or Prolonged Bouts of Winning or Losing Male-Male Contests on Plasticity in Sexually Selected Traits.
    Harrison LM; Vega-Trejo R; Jennions MD
    Am Nat; 2023 Mar; 201(3):442-459. PubMed ID: 36848507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Loser-effect duration evolves independently of fighting ability.
    Okada K; Okada Y; Dall SRX; Hosken DJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 May; 286(1903):20190582. PubMed ID: 31138078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.