136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25531019)
1. Morphological analysis of apical foramen over-instrumented by three rotary NiTi systems.
Liu ZX; Liu Y; Ww Chang J; Yuan CY; Zhang CF; Wang PL
Chin J Dent Res; 2014; 17(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 25531019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidence of apical root cracks and apical dentinal detachments after canal preparation with hand and rotary files at different instrumentation lengths.
Liu R; Kaiwar A; Shemesh H; Wesselink PR; Hou B; Wu MK
J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 23228272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of Rotary Endodontic Instruments on Smear Layer Removal in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
Subramaniam P; Girish Babu KL; Tabrez TA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 26950816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crack initiation on the apical root surface caused by three different nickel-titanium rotary files at different working lengths.
Adorno CG; Yoshioka T; Suda H
J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):522-5. PubMed ID: 21419302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system.
Liu R; Hou BX; Wesselink PR; Wu MK; Shemesh H
J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1054-6. PubMed ID: 23880276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of canal transportation and changes in canal curvature of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
El Batouty KM; Elmallah WE
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1290-2. PubMed ID: 21846551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file.
Yoldas O; Yilmaz S; Atakan G; Kuden C; Kasan Z
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 22244643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of air-driven vs electric torque control motors on canal centering ability by ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Zarei M; Javidi M; Erfanian M; Lomee M; Afkhami F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 23579897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of dentinal and apical crack formation caused by four different nickel-titanium rotary and reciprocating systems in large and small canals.
Zhou X; Jiang S; Wang X; Wang S; Zhu X; Zhang C
Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(6):903-9. PubMed ID: 26632241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of apical foramen deformation produced by manual and mechanized patency maneuvers.
Lopreite G; Basilaki J; Romero M; Hecht P
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2014; 27(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 25523959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in centring and shaping ability using three nickel–titanium instrumentation techniques analysed by micro-computed tomography (μCT).
Stern S; Patel S; Foschi F; Sherriff M; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):514-23. PubMed ID: 22625863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals.
Wu H; Peng C; Bai Y; Hu X; Wang L; Li C
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25886847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of NiTi alloy on the root canal shaping capabilities of the ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold rotary instrument systems.
Duque JA; Vivan RR; Cavenago BC; Amoroso-Silva PA; Bernardes RA; Vasconcelos BC; Duarte MA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2017; 25(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 28198973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Appearance of the root canal walls after preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
Prati C; Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S
Clin Oral Investig; 2004 Jun; 8(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 14760541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Gergi R; Arbab-Chirani R; Osta N; Naaman A
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1223-7. PubMed ID: 25069937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
