These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25532018)

  • 1. Spatial complementarity and the coexistence of species.
    Velázquez J; Garrahan JP; Eichhorn MP
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114979. PubMed ID: 25532018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When does local spatial structure hinder competitive coexistence and reverse competitive hierarchies?
    Murrell DJ
    Ecology; 2010 Jun; 91(6):1605-16. PubMed ID: 20583703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hutchinson revisited: patterns of density regulation and the coexistence of strong competitors.
    Münkemüller T; Bugmann H; Johst K
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jul; 259(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 19298829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial variation and density-dependent dispersal in competitive coexistence.
    Amarasekare P
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Jul; 271(1547):1497-506. PubMed ID: 15306322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disturbance size and frequency mediate the coexistence of benthic spatial competitors.
    Castorani MCN; Baskett ML
    Ecology; 2020 Jan; 101(1):e02904. PubMed ID: 31562771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eco-Evolutionary dynamics enable coexistence via neighbor-dependent selection.
    Vasseur DA; Amarasekare P; Rudolf VH; Levine JM
    Am Nat; 2011 Nov; 178(5):E96-E109. PubMed ID: 22030739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of non-random dispersal strategies on spatial coexistence mechanisms.
    Amarasekare P
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):282-93. PubMed ID: 19682160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stabilization of species coexistence in spatial models through the aggregation-segregation effect generated by local dispersal and nonspecific local interactions.
    Detto M; Muller-Landau HC
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Dec; 112():97-108. PubMed ID: 27609405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A framework for linking competitor ecological differences to coexistence.
    Ousterhout BH; Serrano M; Bried JT; Siepielski AM
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Oct; 88(10):1534-1548. PubMed ID: 31222738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linking metacommunity paradigms to spatial coexistence mechanisms.
    Shoemaker LG; Melbourne BA
    Ecology; 2016 Sep; 97(9):2436-2446. PubMed ID: 27859071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coexistence and competitive exclusion in mutualism.
    Johnson CA; Bronstein JL
    Ecology; 2019 Jun; 100(6):e02708. PubMed ID: 30924140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species.
    Amarasekare P; Nisbet RM
    Am Nat; 2001 Dec; 158(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 18707352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An experimental evaluation of competition between three species of intertidal prosobranch gastropods.
    Underwood AJ
    Oecologia; 1978 Jan; 33(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 28309163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dispersal network heterogeneity promotes species coexistence in hierarchical competitive communities.
    Zhang H; Bearup D; Nijs I; Wang S; Barabás G; Tao Y; Liao J
    Ecol Lett; 2021 Jan; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 33029856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid transgenerational adaptation in response to intercropping reduces competition.
    Stefan L; Engbersen N; Schöb C
    Elife; 2022 Sep; 11():. PubMed ID: 36097813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting coexistence in species with continuous ontogenetic niche shifts and competitive asymmetry.
    Bassar RD; Travis J; Coulson T
    Ecology; 2017 Nov; 98(11):2823-2836. PubMed ID: 28766700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coexistence of cycling and dispersing consumer species: Armstrong and McGehee in space.
    Wilson WG; Abrams PA
    Am Nat; 2005 Feb; 165(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 15729650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When rarity has costs: coexistence under positive frequency-dependence and environmental stochasticity.
    Schreiber SJ; Yamamichi M; Strauss SY
    Ecology; 2019 Jul; 100(7):e02664. PubMed ID: 30773621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coexistence in a variable environment: eco-evolutionary perspectives.
    Kremer CT; Klausmeier CA
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Dec; 339():14-25. PubMed ID: 23702333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.