289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25532603)
1. Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Results of Activ L Total Disk Replacement at 1- to 3-Year Follow-up.
Lu S; Kong C; Hai Y; Kang N; Zang L; Wang Y; Yuan Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Nov; 28(9):E544-50. PubMed ID: 25532603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrospective study on effectiveness of activ L total disc replacement: clinical and radiographical results of 1- to 3-year follow-up.
Lu S; Kong C; Hai Y; Wang Q; Zang L; Kang N; Meng X; Wang Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):E411-7. PubMed ID: 25584945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of a mismatched center of rotation on the clinical outcomes and flexion-extension range of motion: lumbar total disk replacement using mobidisc at a 5.5-year follow-up.
Lee CS; Lee DH; Hwang CJ; Kim H; Noh H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 May; 27(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 22525508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Motion preservation following total lumbar disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction: a prospective long-term clinical and radiographic investigation.
Wuertinger C; Annes RDÀ; Hitzl W; Siepe CJ
Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 28673830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease.
Lu SB; Hai Y; Kong C; Wang QY; Su Q; Zang L; Kang N; Meng XL; Wang Y
Eur Spine J; 2015 Sep; 24(9):2056-64. PubMed ID: 25895882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome.
Meisel HJ; Jurák L; Antinheimo J; Arregui R; Bruchmann B; Čabraja M; Caroli F; Kroppenstedt S; Kryl J; Pohjola J; Shackleford I; Sola S; Stosberg P; Stulik J; Woiciechowsky C; Suchomel P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 27258476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion.
Zigler JE; Glenn J; Delamarter RB
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple-Level Lumbar Total Disk Replacement: A Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of Motion Preservation at 24-72 Months.
Rasouli A; Cuellar JM; Kanim L; Delamarter R
Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Feb; 32(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 30095474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term clinical results following Charite III lumbar total disc replacement.
Lu S; Sun S; Kong C; Sun W; Hu H; Wang Q; Hai Y
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):917-925. PubMed ID: 28870839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamics of improvement following total lumbar disc replacement: is the outcome predictable?
Siepe CJ; Tepass A; Hitzl W; Meschede P; Beisse R; Korge A; Mayer HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19927108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcome of lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L in degenerative disc disease: minimum 5-year follow-up results at a single institute.
Park CK; Ryu KS; Lee KY; Lee HJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):672-7. PubMed ID: 21857395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement.
Mehren C; Heider F; Siepe CJ; Zillner B; Kothe R; Korge A; Mayer HM
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 28676980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiological exploration on adjacent segments after total cervical disc replacement with Prodisc-C prosthesis.
Xu S; Liang Y; Meng F; Wang K; Liu H
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 May; 14(1):160. PubMed ID: 31138246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effectiveness evaluation of Prodisc-C prosthesis for more than 10 years follow-up after total cervical disc replacement].
Xu S; Liang Y; Zhu Z; Wang K; Liu H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 33(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 30983184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP Disc: a minimum 6-year follow-up study.
Zeng J; Liu H; Rong X; Wang B; Yang Y; Gao X; Wu T; Hong Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Aug; 19(1):285. PubMed ID: 30086733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrospective study on effectiveness of Activ L total disc replacement.
Sun W; Wang P; Hu H; Kong C; Hai Y; Lu S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 16(1):2. PubMed ID: 33397397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
