These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25532603)

  • 41. Clinical outcome of monosegmental total disc replacement for lumbar disc disease with ball-and-socket prosthesis (Maverick): prospective study with four-year follow-up.
    Van de Kelft E; Verguts L
    World Neurosurg; 2012; 78(3-4):355-63. PubMed ID: 22120556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
    Pimenta L; Oliveira L; Schaffa T; Coutinho E; Marchi L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 21166491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Minimum 5 year follow-up of multi-segmental lumbar degenerative disease treated with discectomy and the Wallis interspinous device.
    Jiang YQ; Che W; Wang HR; Li RY; Li XL; Dong J
    J Clin Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 22(7):1144-9. PubMed ID: 25890774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Comparative study of dynamic neutralization system and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treating lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang B; Jiang T
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 27(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 23596677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up.
    Wang LN; Hu BW; Wang L; Song YM; Yang X; Liu LM; Liu H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Apr; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 29615017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Interdependence between disc space height, range of motion and clinical outcome in total lumbar disc replacement.
    Siepe CJ; Hitzl W; Meschede P; Sharma AK; Khattab MF; Mayer MH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):904-16. PubMed ID: 19531999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Artificial Cervical Disk Replacement for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.
    Bin S; Xiangwang H; Sheng X; Tiecheng X; Xiangyang L; Yi Z; Bin L
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jun; 30(5):E587-E591. PubMed ID: 28525482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Medium-term effects of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of multisegmental lumbar degenerative disease.
    Wu H; Pang Q; Jiang G
    J Int Med Res; 2017 Oct; 45(5):1562-1573. PubMed ID: 28661265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Lumbar Total Disc Replacement by the Lateral Approach-Up to 10 Years Follow-Up.
    Pokorny G; Marchi L; Amaral R; Jensen R; Pimenta L
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e325-e333. PubMed ID: 30326312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.
    Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
    Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Disc height and motion patterns in the lumbar spine in patients operated with total disc replacement or fusion for discogenic back pain. Results from a randomized controlled trial.
    Berg S; Tropp HT; Leivseth G
    Spine J; 2011 Nov; 11(11):991-8. PubMed ID: 21978518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of total lumbar disc replacement on lumbosacral lordosis.
    Kasliwal MK; Deutsch H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Oct; 25(7):370-3. PubMed ID: 21738074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The impact of coronal alignment of device on radiographic degeneration in the case of total disc replacement.
    Kim SW; Paik SH; Oh JK; Kwak YH; Lee HW; You KH
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):470-9. PubMed ID: 26208879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sequestrectomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: no clinical benefit after 10 years follow-up.
    Hoff E; Strube P; Gross C; Putzier M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):887-95. PubMed ID: 23232214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Artificial disk replacement in the treatment of degenerative cervical disk disorder: a 30-year follow-up study.
    Yang H; Lu X; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen D; Zhao D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1564-71. PubMed ID: 24979275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Nanieva R; Fenk-Mayer A; Husted DS; Shah RV; Emerson JW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Feb; 4(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16506473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Long-Term Outcomes Following Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Using ProDisc-II: Average 10-Year Follow-Up at a Single Institute.
    Park SJ; Lee CS; Chung SS; Lee KH; Kim WS; Lee JY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jun; 41(11):971-977. PubMed ID: 26909840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cervical arthroplasty with ROTAIO® cervical disc prosthesis: first clinical and radiographic outcome analysis in a multicenter prospective trial.
    Obernauer J; Landscheidt J; Hartmann S; Schubert GA; Thomé C; Lumenta C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():11. PubMed ID: 26759165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.