BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25532820)

  • 1. Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: a simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints.
    van der Ploeg T; Austin PC; Steyerberg EW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():137. PubMed ID: 25532820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modern modeling techniques had limited external validity in predicting mortality from traumatic brain injury.
    van der Ploeg T; Nieboer D; Steyerberg EW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():83-89. PubMed ID: 26987507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of three computational modelling methods for the prediction of virological response to combination HIV therapy.
    Wang D; Larder B; Revell A; Montaner J; Harrigan R; De Wolf F; Lange J; Wegner S; Ruiz L; Pérez-Elías MJ; Emery S; Gatell J; D'Arminio Monforte A; Torti C; Zazzi M; Lane C
    Artif Intell Med; 2009 Sep; 47(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19524413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of survival with alternative modeling techniques using pseudo values.
    van der Ploeg T; Datema F; Baatenburg de Jong R; Steyerberg EW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100234. PubMed ID: 24950066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance comparison between Logistic regression, decision trees, and multilayer perceptron in predicting peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Li CP; Zhi XY; Ma J; Cui Z; Zhu ZL; Zhang C; Hu LP
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Mar; 125(5):851-7. PubMed ID: 22490586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods.
    Sahoo AJ; Kumar Y
    Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):531-45. PubMed ID: 24898862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A reliable method for colorectal cancer prediction based on feature selection and support vector machine.
    Zhao D; Liu H; Zheng Y; He Y; Lu D; Lyu C
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Apr; 57(4):901-912. PubMed ID: 30478811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine Learning Models of Survival Prediction in Trauma Patients.
    Rau CS; Wu SC; Chuang JF; Huang CY; Liu HT; Chien PC; Hsieh CH
    J Clin Med; 2019 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 31195670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of intracranial findings on CT-scans by alternative modelling techniques.
    van der Ploeg T; Smits M; Dippel DW; Hunink M; Steyerberg EW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Oct; 11():143. PubMed ID: 22026551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study on feature selection for a risk prediction model for colorectal cancer.
    Cueto-López N; García-Ordás MT; Dávila-Batista V; Moreno V; Aragonés N; Alaiz-Rodríguez R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():219-229. PubMed ID: 31319951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Different Modeling Techniques in Predicting Mortality With the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Longitudinal Study.
    van der Ploeg T; Gobbens R
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Mar; 10(3):e31480. PubMed ID: 35353054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utilizing support vector machine in real-time crash risk evaluation.
    Yu R; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():252-9. PubMed ID: 23287112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of thoracic injury severity in frontal impacts by selected anatomical morphomic variables through model-averaged logistic regression approach.
    Zhang P; Parenteau C; Wang L; Holcombe S; Kohoyda-Inglis C; Sullivan J; Wang S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():172-80. PubMed ID: 24060439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: theory.
    Kruppa J; Liu Y; Biau G; Kohler M; König IR; Malley JD; Ziegler A
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):534-63. PubMed ID: 24478134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting three-year kidney graft survival in recipients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Tang H; Poynton MR; Hurdle JF; Baird BC; Koford JK; Goldfarb-Rumyantzev AS
    ASAIO J; 2011; 57(4):300-9. PubMed ID: 21701272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of regression trees, logistic regression, generalized additive models, and multivariate adaptive regression splines for predicting AMI mortality.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(15):2937-57. PubMed ID: 17186501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural vascular disease in Africans: Performance of ethnic-specific waist circumference cut points using logistic regression and neural network analyses: The SABPA study.
    Botha J; de Ridder JH; Potgieter JC; Steyn HS; Malan L
    Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes; 2013 Oct; 121(9):515-20. PubMed ID: 23934678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Support vector machine-based prediction of local tumor control after stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
    Klement RJ; Allgäuer M; Appold S; Dieckmann K; Ernst I; Ganswindt U; Holy R; Nestle U; Nevinny-Stickel M; Semrau S; Sterzing F; Wittig A; Andratschke N; Guckenberger M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(3):732-8. PubMed ID: 24411630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective independent validation of IMPACT modeling as a prognostic tool in severe traumatic brain injury.
    Panczykowski DM; Puccio AM; Scruggs BJ; Bauer JS; Hricik AJ; Beers SR; Okonkwo DO
    J Neurotrauma; 2012 Jan; 29(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 21933014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between logistic regression and machine learning algorithms on survival prediction of traumatic brain injuries.
    Feng JZ; Wang Y; Peng J; Sun MW; Zeng J; Jiang H
    J Crit Care; 2019 Dec; 54():110-116. PubMed ID: 31408805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.