376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25533080)
21. Generating an Ideal Virtual Setup with Three-Dimensional Crowns and Roots.
Lee RJ; Pham J; Weissheimer A; Tong H
J Clin Orthod; 2015 Nov; 49(11):696-700. PubMed ID: 26684842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-dimensional evaluation of root dimensions and alveolar ridge width of maxillary lateral incisors in patients with unilateral agenesis.
AlRushaid S; Chandhoke T; Utreja A; Tadinada A; Allareddy V; Uribe F
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):30. PubMed ID: 27641422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
Kook YA; Bayome M; Trang VT; Kim HJ; Park JH; Kim KB; Behrents RG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 24974998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs.
Flores-Mir C; Rosenblatt MR; Major PW; Carey JP; Heo G
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):45-53. PubMed ID: 25715716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: A new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology.
Bailey E; Nelson G; Miller AJ; Andrews L; Johnson E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):574-85. PubMed ID: 23561420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional evaluation of root position at the reset appointment without radiographs: a proof-of-concept study.
Lee RJ; Pi S; Park J; Nelson G; Hatcher D; Oberoi S
Prog Orthod; 2018 Jun; 19(1):15. PubMed ID: 29862456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A finite element analysis of the maxillary first molar PDL with maxillary protraction in a mixed dentition Class III malocclusion.
Tanaka OM; Araújo EA; Oliver DR; Behrents RG
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Nov; 18(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 26333535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.
Bouwens DG; Cevidanes L; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 21195286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.
Cattaneo PM; Treccani M; Carlsson K; Thorgeirsson T; Myrda A; Cevidanes LH; Melsen B
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 22008302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography.
Minich CM; Araújo EA; Behrents RG; Buschang PH; Tanaka OM; Kim KB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23810046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [A cone-beam computed tomography study on crown-root morphology of maxillary anterior teeth in Class II, division 2 malocclusion].
Li M; Wang SW; Zhao YJ; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 48(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 26885918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion.
Baka ZM; Akin M; Ucar FI; Ileri Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 25533073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-dimensional analysis of root canal curvature and direction of maxillary lateral incisors by using cone-beam computed tomography.
Park PS; Kim KD; Perinpanayagam H; Lee JK; Chang SW; Chung SH; Kaufman B; Zhu Q; Safavi KE; Kum KY
J Endod; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1124-9. PubMed ID: 23953284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Registration accuracy in the integration of laser-scanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images.
Noh H; Nabha W; Cho JH; Hwang HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 21967948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Acquisition of anatomic parameters concerning molar pulp chamber landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography.
Azim AA; Azim KA; Deutsch AS; Huang GT
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1298-302. PubMed ID: 25146010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tridimensional finite element analysis of teeth movement induced by different headgear forces.
Maruo IT; Maruo H; Saga AY; de Oliveira DD; Argenta MA; Tanaka OM
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27264500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The reliability of using postero-anterior cephalometry and cone-beam CT to determine transverse dimensions in clinical practice.
Tai B; Goonewardene MS; Murray K; Koong B; Islam SM
Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 25549515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
