These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25533151)
1. Discordances originated by multiple meta-analyses on interventions for myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Lucenteforte E; Moja L; Pecoraro V; Conti AA; Conti A; Crudeli E; Galli A; Gensini GF; Minnelli M; Mugelli A; Proietti R; Shtylla J; D'Amico R; Parmelli E; Virgili G J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 25533151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data]. Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions. Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data. Amato L; Fusco D; Acampora A; Bontempi K; Rosa AC; Colais P; Cruciani F; D'Ovidio M; Mataloni F; Minozzi S; Mitrova Z; Pinnarelli L; Saulle R; Soldati S; Sorge C; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Davoli M Epidemiol Prev; 2017; 41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. PubMed ID: 29205995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals. Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews. Hartling L; Featherstone R; Nuspl M; Shave K; Dryden DM; Vandermeer B BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28420349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews]. Davoli M; Amato L; Minozzi S; Bargagli AM; Vecchi S; Perucci CA Epidemiol Prev; 2005; 29(3-4 Suppl):3-63. PubMed ID: 16529350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study. Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strong heterogeneity of outcome reporting in systematic reviews. Sautenet B; Contentin L; Bigot A; Giraudeau B J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():93-9. PubMed ID: 26774825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China. Shi C; Zhu L; Wang X; Qin C; Xu Q; Tian J Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):689-700. PubMed ID: 25532885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry. Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups. Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Data extraction methods: an analysis of internal reporting discrepancies in single manuscripts and practical advice. Puljak L; Riva N; Parmelli E; González-Lorenzo M; Moja L; Pieper D J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():158-164. PubMed ID: 31541692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. Moher D; Tetzlaff J; Tricco AC; Sampson M; Altman DG PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e78. PubMed ID: 17388659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic reviews, overviews of reviews and comparative effectiveness reviews: a discussion of approaches to knowledge synthesis. Hartling L; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Jun; 9(2):486-94. PubMed ID: 25404611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]