168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25533272)
1. Development of a scoliotic spine model for biomechanical in vitro studies.
Wilke HJ; Mathes B; Midderhoff S; Graf N
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 25533272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in alignment of the scoliotic spine in response to lateral bending.
Beuerlein MJ; Raso VJ; Hill DL; Moreau MJ; Mahood JK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(7):693-8. PubMed ID: 12671357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro disc pressure profiles below scoliosis fusion constructs.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2134-42. PubMed ID: 18794754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation of progressive deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a biomechanical model integrating vertebral growth modulation.
Villemure I; Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Labelle H
J Biomech Eng; 2002 Dec; 124(6):784-90. PubMed ID: 12596648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flexible non-fusion scoliosis correction systems reduce intervertebral rotation less than rigid implants and allow growth of the spine: a finite element analysis of different features of orthobiom.
Rohlmann A; Zander T; Burra NK; Bergmann G
Eur Spine J; 2008 Feb; 17(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 17712575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spinal shape changes resulting from scoliotic spine surgical instrumentation expressed as intervertebral rotations and centers of rotation.
Petit Y; Aubin CE; Labelle H
J Biomech; 2004 Feb; 37(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 14706319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lateral spinal profile in school-screening referrals with and without late onset idiopathic scoliosis 10 degrees-20 degrees.
Grivas TB; Dangas S; Samelis P; Maziotou C; Kandris K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():25-31. PubMed ID: 15457689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Segmental vertebral rotation in early scoliosis.
Xiong B; Sevastik J; Hedlund R; Sevastik B
Eur Spine J; 1993 Jun; 2(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 20058446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical modeling of posterior instrumentation of the scoliotic spine.
Aubin CE; Petit Y; Stokes IA; Poulin F; Gardner-Morse M; Labelle H
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Feb; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 12623435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is a collagen scaffold for a tissue engineered nucleus replacement capable of restoring disc height and stability in an animal model?
Wilke HJ; Heuer F; Neidlinger-Wilke C; Claes L
Eur Spine J; 2006 Aug; 15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S433-8. PubMed ID: 16868784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Correlation study between spinal curvatures and vertebral and disk deformities in idiopathic scoliosis].
Villemure I; Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Petit Y; Labelle H
Ann Chir; 1999; 53(8):798-807. PubMed ID: 10584392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical properties in motion of lumbar spines with degenerative scoliosis.
Rustenburg CME; Kingma I; Holewijn RM; Faraj SSA; van der Veen A; Bisschop A; de Kleuver M; Emanuel KS
J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109495. PubMed ID: 31767285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thoracic range of motion, stability, and correlation to imaging-determined degeneration.
Healy AT; Mageswaran P; Lubelski D; Rosenbaum BP; Matheus V; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 25978074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the pathological role of intervertebral disc and facet joint in the development of degenerative scoliosis by biomechanical methods.
Zheng J; Yang Y; Cheng B; Cook D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Dec; 70():83-88. PubMed ID: 31445401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical simulations of the spine deformation process in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from different pathogenesis hypotheses.
Villemure I; Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Labelle H
Eur Spine J; 2004 Feb; 13(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 14730437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanics of the conservative treatment in idiopathic scoliotic curves in surgical "grey-area".
Aulisa L; Lupparelli S; Pola E; Aulisa AG; Mastantuoni G; Pitta L
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():412-8. PubMed ID: 15457767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A biomechanical assessment of thoracic spine stapling.
Puttlitz CM; Masaru F; Barkley A; Diab M; Acaroglu E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):766-71. PubMed ID: 17414910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo distribution of spinal intervertebral stiffness based on clinical flexibility tests.
Lafon Y; Lafage V; Steib JP; Dubousset J; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 20081515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
