229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25533970)
1. Trends in coronary revascularization procedures among Medicare beneficiaries between 2008 and 2012.
Culler SD; Kugelmass AD; Brown PP; Reynolds MR; Simon AW
Circulation; 2015 Jan; 131(4):362-70; discussion 370. PubMed ID: 25533970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Declining use rates of revascularization for Medicare patients: is this a real trend?
Gardner TJ
Circulation; 2015 Jan; 131(4):331-3. PubMed ID: 25533969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Procedure rates and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures in California and New York.
Carey JS; Danielsen B; Gold JP; Rossiter SJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1276-82. PubMed ID: 15942567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeat coronary revascularization after coronary artery bypass surgery in older adults: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' national experience, 1991-2007.
Fosbøl EL; Zhao Y; Shahian DM; Grover FL; Edwards FH; Peterson ED
Circulation; 2013 Apr; 127(16):1656-63. PubMed ID: 23532630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient access and 1-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention facilities with and without on-site cardiothoracic surgery: insights from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) program.
Maddox TM; Stanislawski MA; O'Donnell C; Plomondon ME; Bradley SM; Ho PM; Tsai TT; Shroff AR; Speiser B; Jesse RJ; Rumsfeld JS
Circulation; 2014 Oct; 130(16):1383-91. PubMed ID: 25189215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality.
Jollis JG; Peterson ED; DeLong ER; Mark DB; Collins SR; Muhlbaier LH; Pryor DB
N Engl J Med; 1994 Dec; 331(24):1625-9. PubMed ID: 7969344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries versus bypass grafts in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
Brilakis ES; Rao SV; Banerjee S; Goldman S; Shunk KA; Holmes DR; Honeycutt E; Roe MT
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 4(8):844-50. PubMed ID: 21851896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention in a 'real-world' setting: a comparative effectiveness study based on propensity score-matched cohorts.
Fortuna D; Nicolini F; Guastaroba P; De Palma R; Di Bartolomeo S; Saia F; Pacini D; Grilli R; ;
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Jul; 44(1):e16-24. PubMed ID: 23628951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. All-cause readmission and repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients.
Curtis JP; Schreiner G; Wang Y; Chen J; Spertus JA; Rumsfeld JS; Brindis RG; Krumholz HM
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Sep; 54(10):903-7. PubMed ID: 19712799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcomes after myocardial revascularization according to operator training status: cohort study of 22,697 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Jones DA; Gallagher S; Rathod K; Jain AK; Mathur A; Uppal R; Westwood M; Wong K; Rothman MT; Shipolini A; Smith EJ; Mills PG; Timmis AD; Knight CJ; Archbold RA; Wragg A
Eur Heart J; 2013 Oct; 34(37):2887-95. PubMed ID: 23677845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term outcomes after invasive management for older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Roe MT; Li S; Thomas L; Wang TY; Alexander KP; Ohman EM; Peterson ED
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2013 May; 6(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 23652734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in per capita rates of revascularization and in choice of revascularization procedure for eleven states.
Hannan EL; Wu C; Chassin MR
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Mar; 6():35. PubMed ID: 16542441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008.
Epstein AJ; Polsky D; Yang F; Yang L; Groeneveld PW
JAMA; 2011 May; 305(17):1769-76. PubMed ID: 21540420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State and Ontario.
Ko DT; Tu JV; Samadashvili Z; Guo H; Alter DA; Cantor WJ; Hannan EL
Circulation; 2010 Jun; 121(24):2635-44. PubMed ID: 20529997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. National trends in utilization and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures among people with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain (2001-2011).
Lopez-de-Andres A; Jimenez-García R; Hernandez-Barrera V; Perez-Farinos N; de Miguel-Yanes JM; Mendez-Bailon M; Jimenez-Trujillo I; de Miguel AG; Pino CG; Carrasco-Garrido P
Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2014 Jan; 13():3. PubMed ID: 24383412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of previous revascularization on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Bench TJ; Parikh PB; Jeremias A; Brener SJ; Naidu SS; Shlofmitz RA; Pappas T; Marzo KP; Gruberg L
J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 25(4):166-9. PubMed ID: 23549488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current status and outcomes of coronary revascularization 1999 to 2002: 148,396 surgical and percutaneous procedures.
Mack MJ; Brown PP; Kugelmass AD; Battaglia SL; Tarkington LG; Simon AW; Culler SD; Becker ER
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 77(3):761-6; discussion 766-8. PubMed ID: 14992867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In-hospital mortality and morbidity after robotic coronary artery surgery.
Cavallaro P; Rhee AJ; Chiang Y; Itagaki S; Seigerman M; Chikwe J
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2015 Feb; 29(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 25027106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal changes in coronary revascularization procedures, outcomes, and costs in the bare-metal stent and drug-eluting stent eras: results from the US Medicare program.
Ryan J; Linde-Zwirble W; Engelhart L; Cooper L; Cohen DJ
Circulation; 2009 Feb; 119(7):952-61. PubMed ID: 19204307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is the optimal revascularization technique for isolated disease of the left anterior descending artery: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention?
Patel AJ; Yates MT; Soppa GK
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Jul; 19(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 24667582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
