These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25534602)

  • 1. Outrage at planned changes to Quebec IVF.
    Morin V
    CMAJ; 2015 Feb; 187(2):E61. PubMed ID: 25534602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of insurance coverage on in vitro fertilization practice patterns: a complex relationship.
    Schlaff WD
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 12849797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective.
    Martin JR; Bromer JG; Sakkas D; Patrizio P
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Mar; 95(3):964-9. PubMed ID: 20688327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supreme Court strikes ban on private health insurance.
    Eggertson L
    CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):139. PubMed ID: 15947235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To pay or not to pay.
    Jain T; Hornstein MD
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 12849796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To insure or not to insure: that is the question.
    Frankfurter D
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 12849795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insurance is not a magic bullet for the multiple birth problem associated with assisted reproductive technology.
    Reynolds MA; Schieve LA; Peterson HB
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 12849798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Demarcation between medical schemes and health insurance.
    van den Heever A
    SADJ; 2014 Sep; 69(8):344. PubMed ID: 26548220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expensive but worth it: older parents' attitudes and opinions about the costs and insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization.
    Nachtigall RD; MacDougall K; Davis AC; Beyene Y
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Jan; 97(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22118993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization be mandated?
    Guzick DS
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Aug; 347(9):686-8. PubMed ID: 12200559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quebec proposes to ban women over 42 from having IVF.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2014 Dec; 349():g7724. PubMed ID: 25523468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Particular sorrows, common challenges: specialized infertility treatment and the common good.
    Ryan MA
    Annu Soc Christ Ethics; 1994; ():187-206. PubMed ID: 15685748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Great Recession, insurance mandates, and the use of in vitro fertilization services in the United States.
    Kiatpongsan S; Huckman RS; Hornstein MD
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):448-54. PubMed ID: 25497450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Balancing coverage affordability and continuity under a basic health program option.
    Graves JA; Curtis R; Gruber J
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Dec; 365(24):e44. PubMed ID: 22129219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Categorical nonsense, p<.05.
    Lewis S; Kouri D
    Healthc Q; 2010; 13(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 20523143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Medical progress requires review of insurance coverage of in vitro fertilization. Preimplantation diagnosis not allowed].
    Friedrich J
    Krankenpfl J; 2003; 41(1-3):53-5. PubMed ID: 12718273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health care financing and insurance. Options for design.
    Paolucci F
    Dev Health Econ Public Policy; 2011; 10():1-114. PubMed ID: 21247006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chaoulli decision resonates one year later.
    Kondro W
    CMAJ; 2006 Jul; 175(1):17. PubMed ID: 16818893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facing reality: the Pregnancy Discrimination Act falls short for women undergoing infertility treatment.
    Cushing K
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2010; 40(4):1697-731. PubMed ID: 21280392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving fairness in coverage decisions: an application of the Ethical Force Program's recommendations on infertility treatment.
    Goldberg MK
    Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):106-8; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.