277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25535787)
1. The Effect of Combining Radiographs and DIAGNOdent With Visual Examination on Detection and Treatment Decisions of Noncavitated Occluso-dentinal Caries.
Alomari QD; Qudeimat MA; Khalaf ME; Al-Tarakemah Y
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 25535787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of visual inspection, radiographic examination, laser fluorescence and their combinations on treatment decisions for occlusal surfaces.
Valera FB; Pessan JP; Valera RC; Mondelli J; Percinoto C
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18435372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent) in surveys for the detection of noncavitated occlusal dentine caries.
Rando-Meirelles MP; de Sousa Mda L
Community Dent Health; 2011 Mar; 28(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 21485229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occlusal caries detection: a comparison of DIAGNOdent and two conventional diagnostic methods.
Reis A; Zach VL; de Lima AC; de Lima Navarro MF; Grande RH
J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(3):76-82. PubMed ID: 15688963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study.
Goel A; Chawla HS; Gauba K; Goyal A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 19915274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of diagnodent in detection of occlusal caries in children.
Olmez A; Tuna D; Oznurhan F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 30(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 16937852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity issues of laser fluorescence measurements in occlusal caries diagnosis.
Alwas-Danowska HM; Plasschaert AJ; Suliborski S; Verdonschot EH
J Dent; 2002 May; 30(4):129-34. PubMed ID: 12450718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods.
Attrill DC; Ashley PF
Br Dent J; 2001 Apr; 190(8):440-3. PubMed ID: 11352392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.
de Souza JF; Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Lussi A; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25728100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In Vivo and In Vitro performance of Conventional Methods, DIAGNOdent, and an Electronic Caries Monitor for Occlusal Caries Detection in Primary Teeth.
Kucukyilmaz E; Sener Y; Botsali MS
Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(4):E14-22. PubMed ID: 26314593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occlusal caries detection and quantification by DIAGNOdent and Electronic Caries Monitor: in vitro comparison.
Bamzahim M; Shi XQ; Angmar-Månsson B
Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Dec; 60(6):360-4. PubMed ID: 12512886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth.
Rocha RO; Ardenghi TM; Oliveira LB; Rodrigues CR; Ciamponi AL
Caries Res; 2003; 37(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 14571122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of contact points on the performance of caries detection methods in approximal surfaces of primary molars: an in vivo study.
Ribeiro AA; Purger F; Rodrigues JA; Oliveira PR; Lussi A; Monteiro AH; Alves HD; Assis JT; Vasconcellos AB
Caries Res; 2015; 49(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 25572115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of fluorescence-based and conventional methods of occlusal caries detection in primary molars - an in vitro study.
Novaes TF; Matos R; Gimenez T; Braga MM; DE Benedetto MS; Mendes FM
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Nov; 22(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 22276618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOdent in detection of occlusal caries in newly erupted noncavitated first permanent molars in caries-active children.
Duruturk L; Ciftçi A; Baharoğlu S; Oztuna D
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21913840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Occlusal caries detection with KaVo DIAGNOdent and radiography: an in vitro comparison.
Shi XQ; Welander U; Angmar-Månsson B
Caries Res; 2000; 34(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 10773633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative in vitro validation of VistaProof and DIAGNOdent pen for occlusal caries detection in permanent teeth.
Seremidi K; Lagouvardos P; Kavvadia K
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 22166109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
