276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25535787)
21. Use of high-powered magnification to detect occlusal caries in primary teeth.
Mendes FM; Ganzerla E; Nunes AF; Puig AV; Imparato JC
Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 16555652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Occlusal caries extension in relation to visual and radiographic diagnostic criteria: results from a microcomputed tomography study.
Bücher K; Galler M; Seitz M; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH; Kühnisch J
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 25695643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of laser fluorescence devices for detection of caries in primary teeth.
Cınar C; Atabek D; Odabaş ME; Olmez A
Int Dent J; 2013 Apr; 63(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 23550523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Occlusal caries diagnosis: an in vitro histological validation of the Electronic Caries Monitor (ECM) and other methods.
Ashley PF; Blinkhorn AS; Davies RM
J Dent; 1998 Mar; 26(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 9540303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An in vitro comparison of the ability of fibre-optic transillumination, visual inspection and radiographs to detect occlusal caries and evaluate lesion depth.
Côrtes DF; Ekstrand KR; Elias-Boneta AR; Ellwood RP
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 11093016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Traditional and novel methods for occlusal caries detection: performance on primary teeth.
Souza JF; Boldieri T; Diniz MB; Rodrigues JA; Lussi A; Cordeiro RC
Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Jan; 28(1):287-95. PubMed ID: 22767324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of examiner's clinical experience in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Bengtson AL; Gomes AC; Mendes FM; Cichello LR; Bengtson NG; Pinheiro SL
Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 16173230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical study of the use of the laser fluorescence device DIAGNOdent for detection of occlusal caries in children.
Anttonen V; Seppä L; Hausen H
Caries Res; 2003; 37(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 12566634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of a new fluorescence-based device in the detection of incipient occlusal caries lesions.
Achilleos EE; Rahiotis C; Kakaboura A; Vougiouklakis G
Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Jan; 28(1):193-201. PubMed ID: 22576667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vivo comparison of the efficacy of DIAGNOdent by visual inspection and radiographic diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of occlusal caries.
Akarsu S; Köprülü H
J Clin Dent; 2006; 17(3):53-8. PubMed ID: 17022365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of DIAGNOdent laser fluorescence and the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) in diagnosis of occlusal caries in permanent teeth: an in vivo study.
Castilho LS; Cotta FV; Bueno AC; Moreira AN; Ferreira EF; Magalhães CS
Eur J Oral Sci; 2016 Apr; 124(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 26917102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correlation between fissure discoloration, Diagnodent measurements, and caries depth: an in vitro study.
Francescut P; Lussi A
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):559-64. PubMed ID: 14733470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination.
Ekstrand KR; Ricketts DN; Kidd EA
Caries Res; 1997; 31(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 9165195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography.
Virajsilp V; Thearmontree A; Aryatawong S; Paiboonwarachat D
Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 16532891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validation of different diagnostic aids in detection of occlusal caries in primary molars: An
Shwetha G; Chandra P; Anandakrishna L; Dhananjaya G; Shetty AK; Kamath PS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(4):301-306. PubMed ID: 28914241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro quantification of smooth surface caries with DIAGNOdent and the DIAGNOdent pen.
Aljehani A; Yang L; Shi XQ
Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Feb; 65(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 17354096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions.
Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A; Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M; Owecka M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 24852420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validity of caries detection on occlusal surfaces and treatment decisions based on results from multiple caries-detection methods.
Pereira AC; Eggertsson H; Martinez-Mier EA; Mialhe FL; Eckert GJ; Zero DT
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Feb; 117(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 19196318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic validity of the use of ICDAS II and DIAGNOdent pen verified by micro-computed tomography for the detection of occlusal caries lesions-an in vitro evaluation.
Luczaj-Cepowicz E; Marczuk-Kolada G; Obidzinska M; Sidun J
Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Oct; 34(8):1655-1663. PubMed ID: 31201666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs.
Wenzel A; Larsen MJ; Fejerskov O
Caries Res; 1991; 25(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 1747887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
