These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Are the elements of the proposed ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards informed by the best available science? Goodman JE; Sax SN; Lange S; Rhomberg LR Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jun; 72(1):134-40. PubMed ID: 25857292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A decent proposal? EPA's new clean air standards. Brown KS Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Apr; 105(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 9189700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The United States Environmental Protection Agency has decided on a revision of the national environmental quality standards for ozone and particulate matter]. Hernández-Avila M Salud Publica Mex; 1997; 39(5):401-2. PubMed ID: 9424721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A second chance. Setting a protective ozone standard. Dey R; Van Winkle L; Ewart G; Balmes J; Pinkerton K; Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2010 Feb; 181(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 20130144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The rationale behind updates to ambient ozone guidelines and standards. Xue K; Zhang X Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1273826. PubMed ID: 38756739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exposure information in environmental health research: current opportunities and future directions for particulate matter, ozone, and toxic air pollutants. McKone TE; Ryan PB; Ozkaynak H J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 18385670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying the health impacts of outdoor air pollution: useful estimations for public health action. Medina S; Ballester F; Chanel O; Declercq C; Pascal M J Epidemiol Community Health; 2013 Jun; 67(6):480-3. PubMed ID: 23505307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. EPA's ozone standard may harm public health and welfare. Dudley SE; Gramm WL Risk Anal; 1997 Aug; 17(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 9323870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Accountability within new ozone standards. Foley GJ; Georgopoulos PG; Lioy PJ Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(21):392A-399A. PubMed ID: 14620803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Air-quality standards. EPA adjusts a smog standard to White House preference. Stokstad E Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5870):1602-3. PubMed ID: 18356496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Atmospheric Science. China blamed for U.S. ozone. Hand E Science; 2014 Sep; 345(6202):1233. PubMed ID: 25214586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Decision time on standards for particulate matter in the United States. Guidotti TL Arch Environ Occup Health; 2013; 68(2):63-5. PubMed ID: 23428054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Children at risk from ozone air pollution--United States, 1991-1993. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1995 Apr; 44(16):309-12. PubMed ID: 7715588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the health significance of hazardous air pollutants using monitoring data. Kyle AD; Wright CC; Caldwell JC; Buffler PA; Woodruff TJ Public Health Rep; 2001; 116(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 11571406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health damage from current air pollution levels. Robinson DL Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Jun; 39(3):208-9. PubMed ID: 26041085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Public health. Air pollution concerns not changed by S-PLUS flaw. Colburn KA; Johnson PR Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5607):665-6. PubMed ID: 12560535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]