283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25536009)
1. Scientific evidence supports stronger limits on ozone.
Rice MB; Guidotti TL; Cromar KR;
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2015 Mar; 191(5):501-3. PubMed ID: 25536009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Vehicle emissions: progress and challenges.
Sawyer RF
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 20(6):487-8. PubMed ID: 20820162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical considerations in evaluating scientific evidence of health effects of ambient ozone: a conference report.
McClellan RO; Frampton MW; Koutrakis P; McDonnell WF; Moolgavkar S; North DW; Smith AE; Smith RL; Utell MJ
Inhal Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():1-36. PubMed ID: 19731972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PM 2.5--a killer in our midst.
Bernstein AS; Abelson HT
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Aug; 159(8):786. PubMed ID: 16061788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Are the elements of the proposed ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards informed by the best available science?
Goodman JE; Sax SN; Lange S; Rhomberg LR
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jun; 72(1):134-40. PubMed ID: 25857292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A decent proposal? EPA's new clean air standards.
Brown KS
Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Apr; 105(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 9189700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The United States Environmental Protection Agency has decided on a revision of the national environmental quality standards for ozone and particulate matter].
Hernández-Avila M
Salud Publica Mex; 1997; 39(5):401-2. PubMed ID: 9424721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A second chance. Setting a protective ozone standard.
Dey R; Van Winkle L; Ewart G; Balmes J; Pinkerton K;
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2010 Feb; 181(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 20130144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The rationale behind updates to ambient ozone guidelines and standards.
Xue K; Zhang X
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1273826. PubMed ID: 38756739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exposure information in environmental health research: current opportunities and future directions for particulate matter, ozone, and toxic air pollutants.
McKone TE; Ryan PB; Ozkaynak H
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 18385670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying the health impacts of outdoor air pollution: useful estimations for public health action.
Medina S; Ballester F; Chanel O; Declercq C; Pascal M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2013 Jun; 67(6):480-3. PubMed ID: 23505307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. EPA's ozone standard may harm public health and welfare.
Dudley SE; Gramm WL
Risk Anal; 1997 Aug; 17(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 9323870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Accountability within new ozone standards.
Foley GJ; Georgopoulos PG; Lioy PJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(21):392A-399A. PubMed ID: 14620803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Air-quality standards. EPA adjusts a smog standard to White House preference.
Stokstad E
Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5870):1602-3. PubMed ID: 18356496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Atmospheric Science. China blamed for U.S. ozone.
Hand E
Science; 2014 Sep; 345(6202):1233. PubMed ID: 25214586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Decision time on standards for particulate matter in the United States.
Guidotti TL
Arch Environ Occup Health; 2013; 68(2):63-5. PubMed ID: 23428054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Children at risk from ozone air pollution--United States, 1991-1993.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1995 Apr; 44(16):309-12. PubMed ID: 7715588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the health significance of hazardous air pollutants using monitoring data.
Kyle AD; Wright CC; Caldwell JC; Buffler PA; Woodruff TJ
Public Health Rep; 2001; 116(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 11571406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health damage from current air pollution levels.
Robinson DL
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Jun; 39(3):208-9. PubMed ID: 26041085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Public health. Air pollution concerns not changed by S-PLUS flaw.
Colburn KA; Johnson PR
Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5607):665-6. PubMed ID: 12560535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
