These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Genome-wide eQTLs and heritability for gene expression traits in unrelated individuals. Yang S; Liu Y; Jiang N; Chen J; Leach L; Luo Z; Wang M BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):13. PubMed ID: 24405759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Imperfect Linkage Disequilibrium Generates Phantom Epistasis (& Perils of Big Data). de Los Campos G; Sorensen DA; Toro MA G3 (Bethesda); 2019 May; 9(5):1429-1436. PubMed ID: 30877081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Factors influencing QTL mapping accuracy under complicated genetic models by computer simulation. Su CF; Wang W; Gong SL; Zuo JH; Li SJ Genet Mol Res; 2016 Dec; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 28002599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Genome-wide epistatic expression quantitative trait loci discovery in four human tissues reveals the importance of local chromosomal interactions governing gene expression. Fitzpatrick DJ; Ryan CJ; Shah N; Greene D; Molony C; Shields DC BMC Genomics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):109. PubMed ID: 25765234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Epistatic analysis of carcass characteristics in pigs reveals genomic interactions between quantitative trait loci attributable to additive and dominance genetic effects. Duthie C; Simm G; Doeschl-Wilson A; Kalm E; Knap PW; Roehe R J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2219-34. PubMed ID: 20228239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Influence of gene interaction on complex trait variation with multilocus models. Mäki-Tanila A; Hill WG Genetics; 2014 Sep; 198(1):355-67. PubMed ID: 24990992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Gene actions of QTLs affecting several agronomic traits resolved in a recombinant inbred rice population and two testcross populations. Mei HW; Luo LJ; Ying CS; Wang YP; Yu XQ; Guo LB; Paterson AH; Li ZK Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Jun; 107(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 12721635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Leveraging input and output structures for joint mapping of epistatic and marginal eQTLs. Lee S; Xing EP Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(12):i137-46. PubMed ID: 22689753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Statistical model for characterizing epistatic control of triploid endosperm triggered by maternal and offspring QTLs. Cui Y; Wu R Genet Res; 2005 Aug; 86(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 16181524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. On the classification of epistatic interactions. Gao H; Granka JM; Feldman MW Genetics; 2010 Mar; 184(3):827-37. PubMed ID: 20026678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Phantom Epistasis in Genomic Selection: On the Predictive Ability of Epistatic Models. Schrauf MF; Martini JWR; Simianer H; de Los Campos G; Cantet R; Freudenthal J; Korte A; Munilla S G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Sep; 10(9):3137-3145. PubMed ID: 32709618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparative mapping of quantitative trait loci for tassel-related traits of maize in F Yi Q; Liu Y; Zhang X; Hou X; Zhang J; Liu H; Hu Y; Yu G; Huang Y J Genet; 2018 Mar; 97(1):253-266. PubMed ID: 29666344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]