227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25536468)
1. The effects of saliency on manual reach trajectories and reach target selection.
van Zoest W; Kerzel D
Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt B):179-87. PubMed ID: 25536468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.
Moehler T; Fiehler K
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The visual properties of proximal and remote distractors differentially influence reaching planning times: evidence from pro- and antipointing tasks.
Heath M; DeSimone JC
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3259-3268. PubMed ID: 27405998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trading off stimulus salience for identity: A cueing approach to disentangle visual selection strategies.
Paoletti D; Weaver MD; Braun C; van Zoest W
Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt B):116-24. PubMed ID: 25152318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories.
Song JH; Nakayama K
Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(7):853-61. PubMed ID: 18262583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Salient stimuli capture attention and action.
Kerzel D; Schönhammer J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1633-43. PubMed ID: 23918550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The spatial impact of visual distractors on saccade latency.
McSorley E; McCloy R; Lyne C
Vision Res; 2012 May; 60():61-72. PubMed ID: 22469779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Target selection for visually guided reaching in macaque.
Song JH; Takahashi N; McPeek RM
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 17989239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early top-down control over saccadic target selection: Evidence from a systematic salience difference manipulation.
Goschy H; Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 24323673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulus-salience and the time-course of saccade trajectory deviations.
van Zoest W; Donk M; Van der Stigchel S
J Vis; 2012 Aug; 12(8):16. PubMed ID: 22923727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.
Chechlacz M; Hansen PC; Geng JJ; Cazzoli D
J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):851-866. PubMed ID: 29393718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of near threshold visual distractors on perceptual detection and reaching movements.
Deplancke A; Madelain L; Chauvin A; Cardoso-Leite P; Gorea A; Coello Y
J Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 104(4):2249-56. PubMed ID: 20702742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eye-hand coordination during target selection in a pop-out visual search.
Song JH; McPeek RM
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Nov; 102(5):2681-92. PubMed ID: 19726722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?
Findlay JM; Blythe HI
Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 18691610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The spatial and temporal shape of oculomotor inhibition.
McSorley E; Haggard P; Walker R
Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 19948108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of stimulus color on the control of reaching-grasping movements.
Gentilucci M; Benuzzi F; Bertolani L; Gangitano M
Exp Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 137(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 11310170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of "blind" distractors on eye movement trajectories in visual hemifield defects.
Van der Stigchel S; van Zoest W; Theeuwes J; Barton JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2025-36. PubMed ID: 18416675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The oculomotor salience of flicker, apparent motion and continuous motion in saccade trajectories.
van Zoest W; Heimler B; Pavani F
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 235(1):181-191. PubMed ID: 27683004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attention is captured by distractors that uniquely correspond to controlled objects: an analysis of movement trajectories.
Miles JD; Proctor RW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):819-29. PubMed ID: 25465396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
Barras C; Kerzel D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
