These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25536469)

  • 1. 3D surface configuration modulates 2D symmetry detection.
    Chen CC; Sio LT
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():86-93. PubMed ID: 25536469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collinear facilitation over space and depth.
    Huang PC; Chen CC; Tyler CW
    J Vis; 2012 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 22353779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual detection of symmetry of 3D shapes.
    Sawada T
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):4. PubMed ID: 20884553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing vertical size disparities in distinct depth planes.
    Duke PA; Howard IP
    J Vis; 2012 Aug; 12(8):10. PubMed ID: 22904355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
    Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Human efficiency for symmetry detection on 3D bumpy surfaces].
    Ikeda M; Ishiguchi A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Dec; 75(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 15747563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anisotropies in the perception of stereoscopic surfaces: the role of orientation disparity.
    Cagenello R; Rogers BJ
    Vision Res; 1993 Nov; 33(16):2189-201. PubMed ID: 8273286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are discrimination thresholds a valid measure of variance for judgments of slant from texture?
    Todd JT; Christensen JC; Guckes KM
    J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):20.1-18. PubMed ID: 20462321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface interpolation and 3D relatability.
    Fantoni C; Hilger JD; Gerbino W; Kellman PJ
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(7):29.1-19. PubMed ID: 19146261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociations between slant-contrast and reversed slant-contrast.
    Poom L; Olsson H; Börjesson E
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 17300825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orientation-specific learning of the prior assumption for 3D slant perception.
    Taya S; Sato M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):11063. PubMed ID: 30038249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A laminar cortical model for 3D perception of slanted and curved surfaces and of 2D images: development, attention, and bistability.
    Grossberg S; Swaminathan G
    Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(11):1147-87. PubMed ID: 15050817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hinge versus twist: the effects of 'reference surfaces' and discontinuities on stereoscopic slant perception.
    Gillam B; Blackburn S; Brooks K
    Perception; 2007; 36(4):596-616. PubMed ID: 17564204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex.
    Welchman AE; Deubelius A; Conrad V; Bülthoff HH; Kourtzi Z
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 8(6):820-7. PubMed ID: 15864303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integration of structure-from-motion and symmetry during surface perception.
    Treder MS; Meulenbroek RG
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):5.1-17. PubMed ID: 20465325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of the foreshortening cue in the perception of 3D object slant.
    Ivanov IV; Kramer DJ; Mullen KT
    Vision Res; 2014 Jan; 94():41-50. PubMed ID: 24216007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of motion and number of element locations in mirror symmetry perception.
    Sharman RJ; Gheorghiu E
    Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7():45679. PubMed ID: 28374760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is stereopsis effective in breaking camouflage for moving targets?
    McKee SP; Watamaniuk SN; Harris JM; Smallman HS; Taylor DG
    Vision Res; 1997 Aug; 37(15):2047-55. PubMed ID: 9327053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Symmetry versus repetition in cyclopean vision: a microgenetic analysis.
    Treder MS; van der Helm PA
    Vision Res; 2007 Oct; 47(23):2956-67. PubMed ID: 17881033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative size disparities and the perception of surface slant.
    Kaneko H; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 1996 Jul; 36(13):1919-30. PubMed ID: 8759431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.