These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25536847)

  • 1. Effects of compatible versus competing rhythmic grouping on errors and timing variability in speech.
    Katsika A; Shattuck-Hufnagel ; Mooshammer C; Tiede M; Goldstein L
    Lang Speech; 2014 Dec; 57(Pt 4):544-62. PubMed ID: 25536847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech.
    Shukla M; Nespor M; Mehler J
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 16782083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The transmission of meaning by prosodic phrasing. A comparison of French with english and german using no ls and hs.
    Kohler KJ
    Phonetica; 2010; 67(1-2):100-24. PubMed ID: 20798572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech.
    Kakouros S; Salminen N; Räsänen O
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():181-199. PubMed ID: 29247667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When "okay" is not okay: acoustic characteristics of single-word prosody conveying reluctance.
    van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL13-9. PubMed ID: 23298012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. White bear effects in language production: evidence from the prosodic realization of adjectives.
    Kaland C; Krahmer E; Swerts M
    Lang Speech; 2014 Dec; 57(Pt 4):470-86. PubMed ID: 25536844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relational timing in the production and perception of Japanese singleton and geminate stops.
    Idemaru K; Guion-Anderson S
    Phonetica; 2010; 67(1-2):25-46. PubMed ID: 20798568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A time course of prosodic modulation in phonological inferencing: The case of Korean post-obstruent tensing.
    Kim S; Mitterer H; Cho T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202912. PubMed ID: 30148859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The prosodic domain of phonological encoding: Evidence from speech errors.
    Beirne MB; Croot K
    Cognition; 2018 Aug; 177():1-7. PubMed ID: 29614350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sequential and prosodic design of English and Greek non-valenced news receipts.
    Kaimaki M
    Lang Speech; 2012 Mar; 55(Pt 1):99-117. PubMed ID: 22480028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intonational structure as a word-boundary cue in Tokyo Japanese.
    Warner N; Otake T; Arai T
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 1):107-31. PubMed ID: 20415004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation.
    Bell A; Jurafsky D; Fosler-Lussier E; Girand C; Gregory M; Gildea D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1001-24. PubMed ID: 12597194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Focus in production: tonal shape, intensity and word order.
    Vainio M; Järvikivi J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):EL55-61. PubMed ID: 17348546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding.
    Lee MW; Gibbons J
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):446-56. PubMed ID: 17097626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structural and Referent-Based Effects on Prosodic Expression in Russian.
    Luchkina T; Cole JS
    Phonetica; 2016; 73(3-4):279-313. PubMed ID: 28208137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean.
    Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3373-86. PubMed ID: 19425677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The dynamic nature of language lateralization: effects of lexical and prosodic factors.
    Grimshaw GM; Kwasny KM; Covell E; Johnson RA
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(8):1008-19. PubMed ID: 12667536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early Speech Segmentation in French-learning Infants: Monosyllabic Words versus Embedded Syllables.
    Nishibayashi LL; Goyet L; Nazzi T
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):334-50. PubMed ID: 26529900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of metrical information in apraxia of speech. Perceptual and acoustic analyses of word stress.
    Aichert I; Späth M; Ziegler W
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Feb; 82():171-178. PubMed ID: 26792367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.