These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25536929)

  • 1. Principal component regression and linear mixed model in association analysis of structured samples: competitors or complements?
    Zhang Y; Pan W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 39(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 25536929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Population stratification correction using Bayesian shrinkage priors for genetic association studies.
    Liu Z; Turkmen AS; Lin S
    Ann Hum Genet; 2023 Nov; 87(6):302-315. PubMed ID: 37771252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transformation of Summary Statistics from Linear Mixed Model Association on All-or-None Traits to Odds Ratio.
    Lloyd-Jones LR; Robinson MR; Yang J; Visscher PM
    Genetics; 2018 Apr; 208(4):1397-1408. PubMed ID: 29429966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limitations of principal components in quantitative genetic association models for human studies.
    Yao Y; Ochoa A
    Elife; 2023 May; 12():. PubMed ID: 37140344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CERAMIC: Case-Control Association Testing in Samples with Related Individuals, Based on Retrospective Mixed Model Analysis with Adjustment for Covariates.
    Zhong S; Jiang D; McPeek MS
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Oct; 12(10):e1006329. PubMed ID: 27695091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian LASSO for population stratification correction in rare haplotype association studies.
    Liu Z; Turkmen AS; Lin S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2024 Jan; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 38235525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choice of population structure informative principal components for adjustment in a case-control study.
    Peloso GM; Lunetta KL
    BMC Genet; 2011 Jul; 12():64. PubMed ID: 21771328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robustification of GWAS to explore effective SNPs addressing the challenges of hidden population stratification and polygenic effects.
    Akond Z; Ahsan MA; Alam M; Mollah MNH
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13060. PubMed ID: 34158546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power analysis of principal components regression in genetic association studies.
    Shen YF; Zhu J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2009 Oct; 10(10):721-30. PubMed ID: 19816996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Lasso multi-marker mixed model for association mapping with population structure correction.
    Rakitsch B; Lippert C; Stegle O; Borgwardt K
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Jan; 29(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 23175758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous SNP selection and adjustment for population structure in high dimensional prediction models.
    Bhatnagar SR; Yang Y; Lu T; Schurr E; Loredo-Osti JC; Forest M; Oualkacha K; Greenwood CMT
    PLoS Genet; 2020 May; 16(5):e1008766. PubMed ID: 32365090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the power of GWAS and avoiding confounding from population stratification with PC-Select.
    Tucker G; Price AL; Berger B
    Genetics; 2014 Jul; 197(3):1045-9. PubMed ID: 24788602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel association test for multiple secondary phenotypes from a case-control GWAS.
    Ray D; Basu S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):413-426. PubMed ID: 28393390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of population stratification adjustment using genome-wide or exonic variants.
    Chen Y; Peloso GM; Liu CT; DeStefano AL; Dupuis J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):702-716. PubMed ID: 32608112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing for genetic associations in arbitrarily structured populations.
    Song M; Hao W; Storey JD
    Nat Genet; 2015 May; 47(5):550-4. PubMed ID: 25822090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the substructure controls in rare variant analysis: Principal components or variance components?
    Luo Y; Maity A; Wu MC; Smith C; Duan Q; Li Y; Tzeng JY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 42(3):276-287. PubMed ID: 29280188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of gene-based rare variant association mapping methods for quantitative traits in a bovine population with complex familial relationships.
    Zhang Q; Guldbrandtsen B; Calus MP; Lund MS; Sahana G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Aug; 48(1):60. PubMed ID: 27534618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further improvements to linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies.
    Widmer C; Lippert C; Weissbrod O; Fusi N; Kadie C; Davidson R; Listgarten J; Heckerman D
    Sci Rep; 2014 Nov; 4():6874. PubMed ID: 25387525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of methods to account for relatedness in genome-wide association studies with family-based data.
    Eu-Ahsunthornwattana J; Miller EN; Fakiola M; ; Jeronimo SM; Blackwell JM; Cordell HJ
    PLoS Genet; 2014 Jul; 10(7):e1004445. PubMed ID: 25033443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining Sparse Group Lasso and Linear Mixed Model Improves Power to Detect Genetic Variants Underlying Quantitative Traits.
    Guo Y; Wu C; Guo M; Zou Q; Liu X; Keinan A
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():271. PubMed ID: 31024614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.