BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25537252)

  • 1. [Clinical significance of FIGO 2009 staging I and its prognostic related factors in endometrial carcinoma].
    Zhou J; Zhao L; Qi W; Li X; Wang J; Wei L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):776-9. PubMed ID: 25537252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
    Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical application of adult comorbidity evaluation-27 in endometrial cancer].
    Tian WY; Wang YM; Yan Y; Gao JP; Sun DD; Jiang S; Sheng Y; Teng F; Xue FX
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):810-817. PubMed ID: 27916063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus 'sandwich' adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma.
    Onal C; Sari SY; Yildirim BA; Yavas G; Gultekin M; Guler OC; Akyurek S; Yildiz F
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e28. PubMed ID: 30887753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concomitant postoperative radiation and chemotherapy following surgery was associated with improved overall survival in patients with FIGO stages III and IV endometrial cancer.
    Nakayama K; Nagai Y; Ishikawa M; Aoki Y; Miyazaki K
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2010 Oct; 15(5):440-6. PubMed ID: 20419386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic significance of DNA topoisomerase II-alpha (Ki-S1) immunoexpression in endometrial carcinoma.
    Bildrici K; Tel N; Ozalp SS; Yalcin OT; Yilmaz V
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(6):540-4. PubMed ID: 12556100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of FIGO 1989 and 2009 recommendations on staging of endometrial carcinoma: pathologic analysis and cervical status in 123 consecutive cases.
    Korczynski J; Jesionek-Kupnicka D; Gottwald L; Piekarski J
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Jul; 30(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 21623209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Redefining stage I endometrial cancer: incorporating histology, a binary grading system, myometrial invasion, and lymph node assessment.
    Barlin JN; Soslow RA; Lutz M; Zhou QC; St Clair CM; Leitao MM; Iasonos A; Hensley ML; Barakat RR; Matias-Guiu X; Abu-Rustum NR
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 23(9):1620-8. PubMed ID: 24126219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion and nodal involvement in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer patients treated with curative intent using surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Narayan K; Khaw P; Bernshaw D; Mileshkin L; Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):260-6. PubMed ID: 22080878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.
    Gadducci A; Cosio S; Fanucchi A; Cristofani R; Genazzani AR
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10928137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma.
    Cirisano FD; Robboy SJ; Dodge RK; Bentley RC; Krigman HR; Synan IS; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 10739691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The prognostic value of nuclear grading and the revised FIGO grading of endometrial adenocarcinoma.
    Ayhan A; Taskiran C; Yuce K; Kucukali T
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2003 Jan; 22(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 12496701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision of FIGO surgical staging in 2009 for endometrial cancer validates to improve risk stratification.
    Werner HM; Trovik J; Marcickiewicz J; Tingulstad S; Staff AC; Amant F; Salvesen HB;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22100838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The significance of the amount of myometrial invasion in patients with Stage IB endometrial carcinoma.
    Alektiar KM; McKee A; Lin O; Venkatraman E; Zelefsky MJ; Mychalczak BR; McKee B; Hoskins WJ; Barakat RR
    Cancer; 2002 Jul; 95(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 12124832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of grading systems for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma and their relation with pathologic prognostic parameters.
    Kapucuoglu N; Bulbul D; Tulunay G; Temel MA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(4):790-6. PubMed ID: 17892460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prognostic parameters in FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma of endometrioid type].
    Stanojević Z; Dordević B
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2006 Dec; 63(12):1006-10. PubMed ID: 17252704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tumor size: a better independent predictor of distant failure and death than depth of myometrial invasion in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer.
    Chattopadhyay S; Cross P; Nayar A; Galaal K; Naik R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 May; 23(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 23518862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis: Use of FIGO Grading and Genomic Subcategories in Clinical Practice: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
    Soslow RA; Tornos C; Park KJ; Malpica A; Matias-Guiu X; Oliva E; Parkash V; Carlson J; McCluggage WG; Gilks CB
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2019 Jan; 38 Suppl 1(Iss 1 Suppl 1):S64-S74. PubMed ID: 30550484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lymphadenectomy in women with endometrial cancer: aspiration and reality from a radiation oncologist's point of view.
    Foerster R; Kluck R; Arians N; Rieken S; Rief H; Adeberg S; Bostel T; Schlampp I; Debus J; Lindel K
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jul; 10():147. PubMed ID: 26179059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
    Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
    Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.