These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25537343)

  • 1. Measuring tissue back-pressure--in vivo injection forces during subcutaneous injection.
    Allmendinger A; Mueller R; Schwarb E; Chipperfield M; Huwyler J; Mahler HC; Fischer S
    Pharm Res; 2015 Jul; 32(7):2229-40. PubMed ID: 25537343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tissue Resistance during Large-Volume Injections in Subcutaneous Tissue of Minipigs.
    Allmendinger A; Fischer S
    Pharm Res; 2020 Sep; 37(10):184. PubMed ID: 32888065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of hypodermic needle dimensions on subcutaneous injection delivery--a pig study of injection deposition evaluated by CT scanning, histology, and backflow.
    Juul KA; Bengtsson H; Eyving B; Kildegaard J; Lav S; Poulsen M; Serup J; Stallknecht B
    Skin Res Technol; 2012 Nov; 18(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 22233448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rheological characterization and injection forces of concentrated protein formulations: an alternative predictive model for non-Newtonian solutions.
    Allmendinger A; Fischer S; Huwyler J; Mahler HC; Schwarb E; Zarraga IE; Mueller R
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2014 Jul; 87(2):318-28. PubMed ID: 24560966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraocular pressure and injection forces during intravitreal injection into enucleated porcine eyes.
    Allmendinger A; Butt YL; Mueller C
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2021 Sep; 166():87-93. PubMed ID: 34102300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding Subcutaneous Tissue Pressure for Engineering Injection Devices for Large-Volume Protein Delivery.
    Doughty DV; Clawson CZ; Lambert W; Subramony JA
    J Pharm Sci; 2016 Jul; 105(7):2105-13. PubMed ID: 27287520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcutaneous pneumatic injection of glucose solution: a morphometric evaluation of in vivo micropig skin and tissue-mimicking phantom.
    Cho SB; Kwon TR; Yoo KH; Oh CT; Choi EJ; Kim BJ
    Skin Res Technol; 2017 Feb; 23(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 27430970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Loco-Regional Skin Toxicity Induced by an In Situ Forming Depot after a Single Subcutaneous Injection at Different Volumes and Flow Rates in Göttingen Minipigs.
    Peloso C; Trichet AP; Descotes J; Richard J; Roberge C; Lopez-Noriega A
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Aug; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 34502155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel cannula design improves large volume auto-injection rates for high viscosity solutions.
    Roberts BC; Rini C; Klug R; Sherman DB; Morel D; Pettis RJ
    Drug Deliv; 2022 Dec; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 34962225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the biological performance of the needle-free injector INJEX using the isolated porcine forelimb.
    Wagner S; Dues G; Sawitzky D; Frey P; Christ B
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Mar; 150(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 15030327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection.
    Rini C; Roberts BC; Morel D; Klug R; Selvage B; Pettis RJ
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 May; 13(3):533-545. PubMed ID: 30880448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic behavior of a spring-powered micronozzle needle-free injector.
    Schoubben A; Cavicchi A; Barberini L; Faraon A; Berti M; Ricci M; Blasi P; Postrioti L
    Int J Pharm; 2015 Aug; 491(1-2):91-8. PubMed ID: 26027490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Injectability as a function of viscosity and dosing materials for subcutaneous administration.
    Watt RP; Khatri H; Dibble ARG
    Int J Pharm; 2019 Jan; 554():376-386. PubMed ID: 30414478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In Vitro Simulation of Tissue Back-Pressure for Pen Injectors and Auto-Injectors.
    Yildiz A; Lenau TA
    J Pharm Sci; 2019 Aug; 108(8):2685-2689. PubMed ID: 30959055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of hollow microneedles for targeted delivery of phenylephrine to treat fecal incontinence.
    Jun H; Han MR; Kang NG; Park JH; Park JH
    J Control Release; 2015 Jun; 207():1-6. PubMed ID: 25828366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subcutaneous Injection Volume of Biopharmaceuticals-Pushing the Boundaries.
    Mathaes R; Koulov A; Joerg S; Mahler HC
    J Pharm Sci; 2016 Aug; 105(8):2255-9. PubMed ID: 27378678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of protein rheology and delivery forces for combination products.
    Rathore N; Pranay P; Bernacki J; Eu B; Ji W; Walls E
    J Pharm Sci; 2012 Dec; 101(12):4472-80. PubMed ID: 22941931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of injection force of three insulin delivery pens.
    Asakura T; Seino H; Kageyama M; Yohkoh N
    Expert Opin Pharmacother; 2009 Jun; 10(9):1389-93. PubMed ID: 19466910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calculation of injection forces for highly concentrated protein solutions.
    Fischer I; Schmidt A; Bryant A; Besheer A
    Int J Pharm; 2015 Sep; 493(1-2):70-4. PubMed ID: 26211901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Injectability of biodegradable in situ forming microparticle systems (ISM).
    Rungseevijitprapa W; Bodmeier R
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Mar; 36(4-5):524-31. PubMed ID: 19124076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.