209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25537526)
1. Native reading direction influences lateral biases in the perception of shape from shading.
Smith AK; Szelest I; Friedrich TE; Elias LJ
Laterality; 2015; 20(4):418-33. PubMed ID: 25537526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
Thomas NA; Elias LJ
Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lateral biases in aesthetic and spatial location judgments: differences between tasks and native reading directions.
Smith AK; Duerksen KN; Gutwin C; Elias LJ
Laterality; 2020 Jan; 25(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 30732541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bisections in two languages: when number processing, spatial representation, and habitual reading direction interact.
Kazandjian S; Cavézian C; Zivotofsky AZ; Chokron S
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):4031-7. PubMed ID: 20965204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How does reading direction modulate perceptual asymmetry effects?
Chung HK; Liu JY; Hsiao JH
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1559-1574. PubMed ID: 27223256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lower-right and upper-left biases within upper and lower visual fields in a circular array task.
Szelest I; Elias LJ
Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):861-79. PubMed ID: 25375827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Leftward lighting in advertisements increases advertisement ratings and purchase intention.
Hutchison J; Thomas NA; Elias L
Laterality; 2011 Jul; 16(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 21038169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bias in visual attention behavior in a normal school-aged population.
Cairo Valcarcel E; Ijalba E; Obler LK; Gomez Lozano R; Marin Llanes R; Devia Collazos C; Bouza Herrera C
Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):291-6. PubMed ID: 12030455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vertical scanning biases and their possible influence on reading direction: celtic wisdom or folly?
Amengual AM; Drago V; Foster PS; Leiguarda RC; Heilman KM
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Jan; 14(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 18078536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Egocentric reference in bidirectional readers as measured by the straight-ahead pointing task.
Kazandjian S; Dupierrix E; Gaash E; Love IY; Zivotofsky AZ; De Agostini M; Chokron S
Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():133-41. PubMed ID: 18973747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.
Orr CA; Nicholls ME
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(3):384-93. PubMed ID: 15827740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Native reading direction and corresponding preferences for left- or right-lit images.
Smith AK; Elias LJ
Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Apr; 116(2):355-67. PubMed ID: 24032316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial bias: effects of early reading direction on Korean subjects.
Barrett AM; Kim M; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(7):1003-12. PubMed ID: 11900752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lateral biases in lighting of abstract artwork.
McDine DA; Livingston IJ; Thomas NA; Elias LJ
Laterality; 2011 May; 16(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 20544493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.
Chen J; Kaur J; Abbas H; Wu M; Luo W; Osman S; Niemeier M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212998. PubMed ID: 30845258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lateral biases and reading direction: a dissociation between aesthetic preference and line bisection.
Ishii Y; Okubo M; Nicholls ME; Imai H
Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 21215506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Behavioural asymmetries on the greyscales task: The influence of native reading direction.
Friedrich TE; Elias LJ
Cult Brain; 2014; 2(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 25505645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes.
Benwell CS; Thut G; Learmonth G; Harvey M
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2747-56. PubMed ID: 24076376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]