These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25537526)
21. Spatial selective attention biases are shaped by long-term musical experience and short-term exposure to tones. Cruse A; Offen K; Markant J Brain Cogn; 2018 Aug; 125():106-117. PubMed ID: 29990700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases? Nicholls ME; Roberts GR Cortex; 2002 Apr; 38(2):113-36. PubMed ID: 12056684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Attentional asymmetry between visual hemifields is related to habitual direction of reading and its implications for debate on cause and effects of dyslexia. Kermani M; Verghese A; Vidyasagar TR Dyslexia; 2018 Feb; 24(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 29214682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatial aspects of letter cancellation performance in Arabic readers. Geldmacher DS; Alhaj M Int J Neurosci; 1999 Mar; 97(1-2):29-39. PubMed ID: 10681116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Spatial bias induced by a non-conflictual task reveals the nature of space perception. Dupierrix E; Alleysson D; Ohlmann T; Chokron S Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1214():127-35. PubMed ID: 18462710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of cerebral asymmetries and eye scanning on pseudoneglect for a visual search task. Nicholls ME; Hobson A; Petty J; Churches O; Thomas NA Brain Cogn; 2017 Feb; 111():134-143. PubMed ID: 27923149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Right-lateralised lane keeping in young and older British drivers. Learmonth G; Märker G; McBride N; Pellinen P; Harvey M PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203549. PubMed ID: 30188952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The dynamic effect of reading direction habit on spatial asymmetry of image perception. Afsari Z; Ossandón JP; König P J Vis; 2016 Sep; 16(11):8. PubMed ID: 27611064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task. Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Left face matching bias: right hemisphere dominance or scanning habits? Megreya AM; Havard C Laterality; 2011 Jan; 16(1):75-92. PubMed ID: 21204307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Lateral biases in assumptions of lighting position. Elias LJ; Robinson BM Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):303-5. PubMed ID: 16290919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions. Okubo M; Nicholls ME Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 172(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 16418850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of opposing lateral visuospatial asymmetries in the upper and lower visual fields. Loughnane GM; Shanley JP; Lalor EC; O'Connell RG Cortex; 2015 Feb; 63():220-31. PubMed ID: 25282061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Developmental trajectory of pseudoneglect in adults using the greyscales task. Friedrich TE; Hunter PV; Elias LJ Dev Psychol; 2016 Nov; 52(11):1937-1943. PubMed ID: 27598252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Spatial frequency-specific effects on the attentional bias: Evidence for two attentional systems. Singh VV; Stojanoski B; Le A; Niemeier M Cortex; 2011 May; 47(5):547-56. PubMed ID: 20447620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Gaze data of 4243 participants shows link between leftward and superior attention biases and age. Strauch C; Hoogerbrugge AJ; Ten Brink AF Exp Brain Res; 2024 Jun; 242(6):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 38555556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries. Thomas NA; Elias LJ Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():108-15. PubMed ID: 21362412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differential shift in spatial bias over time depends on observers׳ initial bias: Observer subtypes, or regression to the mean? Newman DP; Loughnane GM; Abe R; Zoratti MT; Martins AC; van den Bogert PC; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():33-40. PubMed ID: 25234646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The influence of distractors and numerical direction on mental number line bisection. Thomas NA; Rose W; Nicholls ME Laterality; 2017 Jan; 22(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 26529579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]