435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25537910)
1. [Clinical efficacy of transperitoneal verus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors with R. E. N. A. L score over 7].
Pu X; Xu Z; Liu J; Zheng X; Li D; Luo Y; Xian Z
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2014 Dec; 34(12):1818-21. PubMed ID: 25537910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Posterior Tumors Through a Retroperitoneal Approach Offers Decreased Length of Stay Compared with the Transperitoneal Approach: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Maurice MJ; Kaouk JH; Ramirez D; Bhayani SB; Allaf ME; Rogers CG; Stifelman MD
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27927035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in an initial case series in Japan.
Tanaka K; Shigemura K; Furukawa J; Ishimura T; Muramaki M; Miyake H; Fujisawa M
J Endourol; 2013 Nov; 27(11):1384-8. PubMed ID: 24044768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Hilar Tumor: Comparison of Perioperative Characteristics and Short-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.
Yang C; Wang Z; Huang S; Xue L; Fu D; Chong T
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Oct; 28(10):1183-1187. PubMed ID: 29668402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience.
Tugcu V; Bitkin A; Sonmezay E; Polat H; Ilbey YO; Taşçi AI
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 22670314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fan X; Xu K; Lin T; Liu H; Yin Z; Dong W; Huang H; Huang J
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):611-21. PubMed ID: 23106964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy after adjusting for tumor complexity.
Gin GE; Maschino AC; Spaliviero M; Vertosick EA; Bernstein ML; Coleman JA
Urology; 2014 Dec; 84(6):1355-60. PubMed ID: 25288573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score of 7 or higher).
Jang HJ; Song W; Suh YS; Jeong US; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Seo SI
Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):808-13. PubMed ID: 25512815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for moderately complex renal hilar tumors.
Xu B; Zhang Q; Jin J
Urol Int; 2014; 92(4):400-6. PubMed ID: 24296329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of gender difference on operative time in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumor and the utility of retroperitoneal fat thickness as a predictor of operative time.
Ito H; Makiyama K; Kawahara T; Osaka K; Izumi K; Yokomizo Y; Nakaigawa N; Yao M
BMC Cancer; 2016 Dec; 16(1):944. PubMed ID: 27955631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nephrometry score matched robotic vs. laparoscopic vs. open partial nephrectomy.
Banapour P; Abdelsayed GA; Bider-Canfield Z; Elliott PA; Kilday PS; Chien GW
J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):679-685. PubMed ID: 29556868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.
Wright JL; Porter JR
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):841-5. PubMed ID: 16093966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy for Large (>7 cm) Solid Renal Tumors: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes with the Transperitoneal Approach.
Kim HY; Lee DS; Yoo JM; Lee JH; Lee SJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Apr; 27(4):393-397. PubMed ID: 28234014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and efficacy of retroperitoneal sutureless zero ischemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for low nephrometry score masses.
Corongiu E; Grande P; Di Santo A; Pagliarella G; Squillacciotti S; Liberati E; Zampelli A; Olivieri V; Innocenzi M; Forte F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Oct; 91(3):. PubMed ID: 31577100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm.
Simmons MN; Chung BI; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2009 Jan; 55(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 18684555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of surgical outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for lateral renal tumors: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis.
Takagi T; Yoshida K; Kondo T; Kobayashi H; Iizuka J; Okumi M; Ishida H; Tanabe K
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 32358741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 3-dimensional laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in the treatment of complex renal tumor with partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matching analysis.
Hu M; Guan C; Xu H; Gu M; Fang W; Yang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(40):e17435. PubMed ID: 31577762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
Desai MM; Strzempkowski B; Matin SF; Steinberg AP; Ng C; Meraney AM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 15592021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for renal tumours of high surgical complexity: a single-institute comparison between clampless and clamped procedures.
Verze P; Fedelini P; Chiancone F; Cucchiara V; La Rocca R; Fedelini M; Meccariello C; Palmieri A; Mirone V
World J Urol; 2017 Mar; 35(3):403-409. PubMed ID: 27324881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in consecutive patients: the Cornell experience.
Schiff JD; Palese M; Vaughan ED; Sosa RE; Coll D; Del Pizzo JJ
BJU Int; 2005 Oct; 96(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 16153207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
