BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25537958)

  • 1. Performance of digital screening mammography among older women in the United States.
    Henderson LM; O'Meara ES; Braithwaite D; Onega T;
    Cancer; 2015 May; 121(9):1379-86. PubMed ID: 25537958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.
    van Luijt PA; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ;
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 49(16):3517-25. PubMed ID: 23871248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
    White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
    Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.
    Miglioretti DL; Zhu W; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Onega T; Buist DS; Henderson LM; Smith RA;
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1069-77. PubMed ID: 26501844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.
    Weigel S; Batzler WU; Decker T; Hense HW; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2009 Dec; 181(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 19859859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.
    Ernster VL; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Zheng Y; Weaver DL; Cutter G; Yankaskas BC; Rosenberg R; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Taplin SH; Urban N; Geller BM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(20):1546-54. PubMed ID: 12381707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening program.
    McCarthy AM; Kontos D; Synnestvedt M; Tan KS; Heitjan DF; Schnall M; Conant EF
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Nov; 106(11):. PubMed ID: 25313245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The contribution of mammography screening to breast cancer incidence trends in the United States: an updated age-period-cohort model.
    Gangnon RE; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Alagoz O; Weedon-Fekjær H; Holford TR; Trentham-Dietz A
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Jun; 24(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 25787716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Impact of digital mammography in the detection and management of microcalcifications].
    Mellado M; Osa AM; Murillo A; Bermejo R; Burguete A; Pons MJ; Erdozain N
    Radiologia; 2013; 55(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22015223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography.
    Weaver DL; Rosenberg RD; Barlow WE; Ichikawa L; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Geller BM; Key CR; Maygarden SJ; Ballard-Barbash R
    Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):732-42. PubMed ID: 16411214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcome assessment in mammography: an audit of 7,506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations.
    Tunçbilek I; Ozdemir A; Gültekin S; Oğur T; Erman R; Yüce C
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Dec; 13(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 18092288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection Rate, Recall Rate, and Positive Predictive Value of Digital Compared to Screen-Film Mammography in the Quebec Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Théberge I; Vandal N; Langlois A; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Nov; 67(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 27451910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature.
    Carbonaro LA; Di Leo G; Clauser P; Trimboli RM; Verardi N; Fedeli MP; Girometti R; Tafà A; Bruscoli P; Saguatti G; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):808-14. PubMed ID: 26971428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incremental effect from integrating 3D-mammography (tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography: Increased breast cancer detection evident for screening centres in a population-based trial.
    Caumo F; Bernardi D; Ciatto S; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Breast; 2014 Feb; 23(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24316152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.