These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25538644)

  • 1. Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety.
    Kappenman ES; Farrens JL; Luck SJ; Proudfit GH
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1368. PubMed ID: 25538644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrocortical evidence for rapid allocation of attention to threat in the dot-probe task.
    Kappenman ES; MacNamara A; Proudfit GH
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 10(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 25062842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The N2pc component reliably captures attentional bias in social anxiety.
    Reutter M; Hewig J; Wieser MJ; Osinsky R
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Apr; 54(4):519-527. PubMed ID: 28111770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of the diffusion model on dot-probe task performance in children with behavioral inhibition.
    Wise S; Huang-Pollock C; Pérez-Edgar K
    Psychol Res; 2022 Apr; 86(3):831-843. PubMed ID: 34047824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability (or lack thereof) of smartphone ecological momentary assessment of visual dot probe attention bias toward threat indices.
    Zainal NH; Jacobson NC
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2024 Mar; 82():101918. PubMed ID: 37907019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional bias modification in social anxiety: Effects on the N2pc component.
    Reutter M; Hewig J; Wieser MJ; Osinsky R
    Behav Res Ther; 2019 Sep; 120():103404. PubMed ID: 31247509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability measures in the dot-probe task among people with social anxiety disorder.
    Molloy A; Anderson PL
    Psychol Assess; 2020 Sep; 32(9):883-888. PubMed ID: 32525343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The stability and reliability of attentional bias measures in the dot-probe task: Evidence from both traditional mean bias scores and trial-level bias scores.
    Carlson JM; Fang L
    Motiv Emot; 2020 Oct; 44(5):657-669. PubMed ID: 33551518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extended testing with the dot-probe task increases test-retest reliability and validity.
    Aday JS; Carlson JM
    Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 30171401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task.
    Chapman A; Devue C; Grimshaw GM
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):308-320. PubMed ID: 29159699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early and late dot-probe attentional bias to mild and high threat pictures: Relations with EEG theta/beta ratio, self-reported trait attentional control, and trait anxiety.
    van Son D; Angelidis A; Hagenaars MA; van der Does W; Putman P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Dec; 55(12):e13274. PubMed ID: 30132917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neurophysiological correlates of attentional bias for emotional faces in socially anxious individuals - Evidence from a visual search task and N2pc.
    Wieser MJ; Hambach A; Weymar M
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Feb; 132():192-201. PubMed ID: 29307540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of single-session reward-based attentional bias modification on attentional biases towards threat as measured by the N2pc component.
    Kang S; Osinsky R
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1279311. PubMed ID: 38054167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two probes and better than one: Development of a psychometrically reliable variant of the attentional probe task.
    Grafton B; Teng S; MacLeod C
    Behav Res Ther; 2021 Mar; 138():103805. PubMed ID: 33485106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patterns of attention to threat across tasks in behaviorally inhibited children at risk for anxiety.
    Morales S; Taber-Thomas BC; Pérez-Edgar KE
    Dev Sci; 2017 Mar; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 26786586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disgust face captures more attention in individuals with high social anxiety when cognitive resources are abundant: Evidence from N2pc.
    Yuan J; Zhang Q; Cui L
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jan; 151():107731. PubMed ID: 33347915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental control of conflict in a predictive visual probe task: Highly reliable bias scores related to anxiety.
    Gladwin TE; Halls M; Vink M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jul; 218():103357. PubMed ID: 34175671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event-related potentials of attentional bias toward faces in the dot-probe task: A systematic review.
    Torrence RD; Troup LJ
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jun; 55(6):e13051. PubMed ID: 29266532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What does the facial dot-probe task tell us about attentional processes in social anxiety? A systematic review.
    Bantin T; Stevens S; Gerlach AL; Hermann C
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Mar; 50():40-51. PubMed ID: 26042381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the psychometric properties of dot-probe attention measures using response-based computation.
    Evans TC; Britton JC
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2018 Sep; 60():95-103. PubMed ID: 29580549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.