229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25539094)
1. Self-measurement of upper extremity volume in women post-breast cancer: reliability and validity study.
Mori T; Lustman A; Katz-Leurer M
Physiother Theory Pract; 2015 May; 31(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25539094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-Measured Arm Circumference in Women With Breast Cancer Is Reliable and Valid.
Rafn BS; McNeely ML; Camp PG; Midtgaard J; Campbell KL
Phys Ther; 2019 Feb; 99(2):240-253. PubMed ID: 30289500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume.
Karges JR; Mark BE; Stikeleather SJ; Worrell TW
Phys Ther; 2003 Feb; 83(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 12564949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional imaging for measuring the volume of the arm.
Erends M; van der Aa T; de Grzymala AP; van der Hulst R
Lymphat Res Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 25495383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of the Inverse Water Volumetry Method to Measure the Volume of the Upper Limb.
Beek MA; te Slaa A; van der Laan L; Mulder PG; Rutten HJ; Voogd AC; Luiten EJ; Gobardhan PD
Lymphat Res Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 26091408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring Limb Volume: Accuracy and Reliability of Tape Measurement Versus Perometer Measurement.
Sharkey AR; King SW; Kuo RY; Bickerton SB; Ramsden AJ; Furniss D
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 28956715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and Reliability of Three-Dimensional Imaging for Measuring Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema in the Upper Limb: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Preuß M; Killaars R; Piatkowski de Grzymala A; Binnebösel M; Neumann U
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Dec; 16(6):525-532. PubMed ID: 30281382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement Properties of Instruments for Measuring of Lymphedema: Systematic Review.
Hidding JT; Viehoff PB; Beurskens CH; van Laarhoven HW; Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW; van der Wees PJ
Phys Ther; 2016 Dec; 96(12):1965-1981. PubMed ID: 27340195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Bioimpedance in the Evaluation of Lymphedema Secondary to Treatment of Breast Cancer.
Ferro AP; Ferreira VTK; Rezende MS; de Souza TR; Almeida AM; Guirro RRJ; Guirro ECO
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Jun; 16(3):282-286. PubMed ID: 29252100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing Arm Volume in People During and After Treatment for Breast Cancer: Reliability and Convergent Validity of the LymphaTech System.
Binkley JM; Weiler MJ; Frank N; Bober L; Dixon JB; Stratford PW
Phys Ther; 2020 Mar; 100(3):457-467. PubMed ID: 32043125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D stereophotogrammetry in upper-extremity lymphedema: An accurate diagnostic method.
Hameeteman M; Verhulst AC; Vreeken RD; Maal TJ; Ulrich DJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):241-7. PubMed ID: 26590631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a Novel Water-Based Volumetric Device for Measuring Upper Limb Lymphedema: First Experience with Healthy Volunteers.
Wolfs JAGN; Bijkerk E; Schols RM; Keuter XHA; van der Hulst RRWJ; Qiu SS
Lymphat Res Biol; 2019 Aug; 17(4):434-439. PubMed ID: 30653398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
