84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25539230)
1. Pairwise comparison versus Likert scale for biomedical image assessment.
Phelps AS; Naeger DM; Courtier JL; Lambert JW; Marcovici PA; Villanueva-Meyer JE; MacKenzie JD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 25539230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of interreader reproducibility of the prostate imaging reporting and data system and likert scales for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI.
Rosenkrantz AB; Lim RP; Haghighi M; Somberg MB; Babb JS; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W612-8. PubMed ID: 24059400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring observer performance in chest radiology: some experiences.
Potchen EJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 17412097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Leipsic J; Nguyen G; Brown J; Sin D; Mayo JR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1095-9. PubMed ID: 20966312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Upgrade to iterative image reconstruction (IR) in MDCT imaging: a clinical study for detailed parameter optimization beyond vendor recommendations using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction environment (ASIR) Part2: The chest.
Mueck FG; Michael L; Deak Z; Scherr MK; Maxien D; Geyer LL; Reiser M; Wirth S
Rofo; 2013 Jul; 185(7):644-54. PubMed ID: 23696019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative assessment of the influence of anatomic noise on the detection of subtle lung nodule in digital chest radiography using fractal-feature distance.
Imai K; Ikeda M; Enchi Y; Niimi T
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Nov; 68(2):353-7. PubMed ID: 17920222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging in the pelvis at 3T-A feasibility study.
Thian YL; Xie W; Porter DA; Weileng Ang B
Acad Radiol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):531-7. PubMed ID: 24594423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel registration method for interval change detection between two chest X-ray images with different rotation angles.
Shimizu A; Matsuo Y; Kobatake H
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):503-11. PubMed ID: 16554231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose reduction with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) technique for chest CT in children: an intra-individual comparison.
Lee SH; Kim MJ; Yoon CS; Lee MJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):e938-43. PubMed ID: 22795526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Hahn S; Kim TJ; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 18212217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prototype system for enhancement of frontal chest radiographs using eigenimage processing.
Butler A; Bones P; Hurrell M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Jun; 52(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 18477119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated patient identity recognition by analysis of chest radiograph features.
Kao EF; Lin WC; Jaw TS; Liu GC; Wu JS; Lee CN
Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):1024-31. PubMed ID: 23830608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of prostate lesions as benign or malignant at multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of three scoring systems in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.
Vaché T; Bratan F; Mège-Lechevallier F; Roche S; Rabilloud M; Rouvière O
Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):446-55. PubMed ID: 24937690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of high-pitch dual-source CT to compensate motion artifacts: a phantom study.
Farshad-Amacker NA; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T
Acad Radiol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):1234-9. PubMed ID: 24029055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Projection profile analysis for identifying different views of chest radiographs.
Kao EF; Lee C; Jaw TS; Hsu JS; Liu GC
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):518-25. PubMed ID: 16554233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and evaluation of a software tool for the generation of virtual liver lesions in multidetector-row CT datasets.
Karantzavelos K; Shin HO; Jördens S; King B; Ringe K; Hartung D; Wacker F; von Falck C
Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):614-20. PubMed ID: 23477827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of subjective assessment of the low-contrast visibility in constancy control of computed tomography.
Thilander-Klang A; Ledenius K; Hansson J; Sund P; Båth M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):449-54. PubMed ID: 20176732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
