These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

774 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25539255)

  • 1. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
    Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-resolution 3D unenhanced ECG-gated respiratory-navigated MR angiography of the renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Mohrs OK; Petersen SE; Schulze T; Zieschang M; Küx H; Schmitt P; Bergemann S; Kauczor HU
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1423-8. PubMed ID: 21098205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Angeretti MG; Lumia D; Canì A; Barresi M; Nocchi Cardim L; Piacentino F; Maresca AM; Novario R; Genovese EA; Fugazzola C
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 23550187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unenhanced respiratory-gated magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of renal artery in hypertensive patients using true fast imaging with steady-state precession technique compared with contrast-enhanced MRA.
    Zhang W; Lin J; Wang S; Lv P; Wang L; Liu H; Chen C; Zeng M
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):700-4. PubMed ID: 24733000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gadobenate dimeglumine and gadofosveset trisodium for MR angiography of the renal arteries: Multicenter intraindividual crossover comparison.
    Schneider G; Pasowicz M; Vymazal J; Seidl Z; Aschauer M; Konopka M; Bilecen D; Iezzi R; Ballarati C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):476-85. PubMed ID: 20651208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
    Rountas C; Vlychou M; Vassiou K; Liakopoulos V; Kapsalaki E; Koukoulis G; Fezoulidis IV; Stefanidis I
    Ren Fail; 2007; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Navigator-gated MR angiography of the renal arteries: a potential screening tool for renal artery stenosis.
    Maki JH; Wilson GJ; Eubank WB; Glickerman DJ; Millan JA; Hoogeveen RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jun; 188(6):W540-6. PubMed ID: 17515344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification].
    Marchand B; Hernandez-Hoyos M; Orkisz M; Douek P
    J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):312-320. PubMed ID: 11148391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of renal artery in hypertensive patients by unenhanced MR angiography using spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses sequence and by CT angiography.
    Pei Y; Shen H; Li J; Zhang H; Xia L; Wang L; Hu D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1142-8. PubMed ID: 23096191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
    Gaddikeri S; Mitsumori L; Vaidya S; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
    Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and safety of gadobutrol-enhanced MRA of the renal arteries: Results from GRAMS (Gadobutrol-enhanced renal artery MRA study), a prospective, intraindividual multicenter phase 3 blinded study.
    Fabrega-Foster KE; Agarwal S; Rastegar N; Haverstock D; Agris JM; Kamel IR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 47(2):572-581. PubMed ID: 28574637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA.
    Glockner JF; Takahashi N; Kawashima A; Woodrum DA; Stanley DW; Takei N; Miyoshi M; Sun W
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 20512894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Wyttenbach R; Braghetti A; Wyss M; Alerci M; Briner L; Santini P; Cozzi L; Di Valentino M; Katoh M; Marone C; Vock P; Gallino A
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 17717326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Renal artery stenosis: comparative assessment by unenhanced renal artery MRA versus contrast-enhanced MRA.
    Khoo MM; Deeab D; Gedroyc WM; Duncan N; Taube D; Dick EA
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Jul; 21(7):1470-6. PubMed ID: 21337034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography utilizing parallel acquisition techniques in renal artery stenosis detection.
    Slanina M; Zizka J; Klzo L; Lojík M
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e46-50. PubMed ID: 19671492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of gadodiamide-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
    Garovic VD; Achauer MA; Kittner T; Horák D; Sheng R; Stanson AW
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 31(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 20099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
    Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-resolution steady state magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: are intravascular agents necessary?: feasibility and preliminary experience with gadobenate dimeglumine.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Kirchin MA; Neira C; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Dec; 44(12):784-92. PubMed ID: 19858728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries.
    Korst MB; Joosten FB; Postma CT; Jager GJ; Krabbe JK; Barentsz JO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 10701600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.