These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25539330)

  • 41. A comparison of acellular dermal matrix to autologous dermal flaps in single-stage, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Krishnan NM; Chatterjee A; Van Vliet MM; Powell SG; Rosen JM; Nigriny JF
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):953-961. PubMed ID: 23629077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction provides protection from postmastectomy radiation therapy: a clinicopathologic perspective.
    Park TH; Chung SW; Song SY; Lew DH; Roh TS; Lee DW
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Mar; 29(3):27. PubMed ID: 29511877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dermal Autograft Using Donor Breast as Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Review.
    North WD; Kubajak CS; St Martin B; Rinker B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 78(6S Suppl 5):S282-S285. PubMed ID: 28296716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Human acellular dermis versus no acellular dermis in tissue expansion breast reconstruction.
    Parks JW; Hammond SE; Walsh WA; Adams RL; Chandler RG; Luce EA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Oct; 130(4):739-746. PubMed ID: 23018685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend™) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: A prospective observational study in a single centre.
    Headon H; Kasem A; Manson A; Choy C; Carmichael AR; Mokbel K
    Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 25(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 27312036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Local safety of immediate reconstruction during primary treatment of breast cancer. Direct-to-implant versus expander-based surgery.
    Riggio E; Toffoli E; Tartaglione C; Marano G; Biganzoli E
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):232-242. PubMed ID: 30497914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Single-stage immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: Experience gained and lessons learnt from patient reported outcome measures.
    Apte A; Walsh M; Chandrasekharan S; Chakravorty A
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 26651226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Utility of acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction in the setting of radiation: a comparative analysis.
    Seth AK; Hirsch EM; Fine NA; Kim JYS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Oct; 130(4):750-758. PubMed ID: 23018687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs.
    Colwell AS; Damjanovic B; Zahedi B; Medford-Davis L; Hertl C; Austen WG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Dec; 128(6):1170-1178. PubMed ID: 22094736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Direct-to-Implant Extracellular Matrix Hammock-based Breast Reconstruction; Prepectoral or Subpectoral?
    Dyrberg DL; Gunnarsson GL; Bille C; Sørensen JA; Thomsen JB
    Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 32041661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Immediate breast reconstruction surgery with expander/direct implant and use of acellular dermal matrix: Does hormone therapy increases the risk of infection?
    Danino MA; Giaccone D; El Khatib A; Dimitropoulos G; Doucet O; Gagnon A; Retchkiman M; Bou-Merhi J; Bernier C
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2020 Jul; 65(4):277-283. PubMed ID: 32493612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity.
    Sbitany H; Serletti JM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Dec; 128(6):1162-1169. PubMed ID: 22094735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Impact and outcome of human acellular dermal matrix size for immediate and two-stage breast reconstruction.
    Cayci C; Santner F; Jacobson SR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jul; 132(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 23806904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A Matched-Pair Analysis of Prepectoral with Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Postoperative Complication Rate?
    Momeni A; Remington AC; Wan DC; Nguyen D; Gurtner GC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Oct; 144(4):801-807. PubMed ID: 31568276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center.
    Selber JC; Wren JH; Garvey PB; Zhang H; Erickson C; Clemens MW; Butler CE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jul; 136(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 26111310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
    Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the prepectoral breast reconstruction with Braxon dermal matrix: First multicenter European report on 100 cases.
    Vidya R; Masià J; Cawthorn S; Berna G; Bozza F; Gardetto A; Kołacińska A; Dell'Antonia F; Tiengo C; Bassetto F; Caputo GG; Governa M
    Breast J; 2017 Nov; 23(6):670-676. PubMed ID: 28481477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Indications and Pitfalls of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Braxon
    Bojanic C; Lawrence A; Mitrasinovic S; Samaras S; Fopp LJ; Forouhi P; Malata CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Aug; 74(8):1931-1971. PubMed ID: 33972202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of two cadaveric acellular dermal matrices for immediate breast reconstruction: A prospective randomized trial.
    Hinchcliff KM; Orbay H; Busse BK; Charvet H; Kaur M; Sahar DE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 May; 70(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 28341592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.